WASHINGTON — A State Department report Friday on Israel’s military conduct in the Gaza Strip said it was “reasonable to assess” that US-provided weapons have been used in violation of international humanitarian law but that there was not sufficient evidence to support withholding military assistance.

Israel had not shared enough information to verify whether US arms were “specifically used” in alleged violations of international humanitarian or human rights law since Oct. 7, the report said.

The highly anticipated report to Congress, which looked at possible violations through late April, nonetheless said it considered Israel’s assurances about its compliance with international humanitarian law to be “credible and reliable.”

It came to the same conclusion about the six other US arms recipients who are engaged in active armed conflict — Colombia, Iraq, Kenya, Nigeria, Somalia and Ukraine.

A senior State Department official describing the report said the nature of the conflict in Gaza made it difficult to assess individual incidents and noted that Israel has opened a number of criminal investigations into possible violations.

The first-of-its-kind report to Congress was required under a Feb. 8 directive issued by President Joe Biden, who was facing pressure from congressional Democrats concerned that US weaponry was contributing to the soaring death toll in Gaza.

The directive, known as NSM-20, also required a determination on whether Israel had arbitrarily denied or restricted the delivery of US humanitarian assistance.

“Since October 7, and particularly in the initial months, Israel did not fully cooperate with United States government efforts and United States government-supported international efforts to maximize humanitarian assistance flow to and distribution within Gaza,” the report said.

The State Department does not assess, however, that the Israeli government is intentionally obstructing aid access as defined by Section 620I of the Foreign Assistance Act, which bars US arms and security assistance from going to countries that restrict the delivery of US-backed humanitarian assistance.

The determination is likely to rankle those who say the Biden administration could be doing more to leverage the pipeline of military aid to stem the bloodshed in Gaza.

The memorandum was modeled off an amendment to the National Security Act proposed by Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) earlier this year. In a briefing with reporters Friday evening, the Maryland Democrat said the report “fails to do the hard work of making an assessment.”

“The Biden administration is taking at face value many of the representations made by the Netanyahu government, but when there's clear, independent evidence to the contrary, they don't make that final conclusion,” Van Hollen said.

The report’s release also angered prominent Republicans, including Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, who said the report served “no purpose other than to provide political cover to the president with his base."

Senator Jim Risch (R-Idaho), ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, called it an attempt to "to placate voters on the far left at the expense of a close ally."

The State Department delivered its report days after Biden said he would withhold offensive weapons to Israel should it launch a major assault on Gaza’s southernmost city of Rafah. US officials have warned an Israeli ground invasion would cause massive casualties among the roughly 1.4 million Palestinians sheltering in the crowded city.

The administration paused a planned shipment to Israel of 2,000-pound and 500-pound bombs last week over concerns they would be used in Rafah.

Biden acknowledged in a CNN interview Wednesday that Israel has used bombs provided by the United States to kill Palestinian civilians. He has previously characterized Israel’s bombing of Gaza as “indiscriminate.”

Israel denies targeting civilians and says its military campaign is focused on eradicating Hamas.

The Biden administration has long said Israel should be doing more to minimize civilian harm and expand humanitarian aid access in the Gaza Strip but stopped short of accusing its top partner in the Middle East of violating international law.

In a letter to Biden last week, a group of 88 House Democrats said there was “sufficient evidence” to conclude that the continued supply of weapons to Israel violates the Foreign Assistance Act.

The lawmakers cited Israel’s resistance to opening land and sea routes into Gaza, its denial of planned humanitarian convoys and its “arbitrary restrictions” on goods entering the territory.

The Health Ministry in Gaza said Friday that nearly 35,000 people — most of them women and children — have died in the war that Israel launched in retaliation for the Hamas-led killing of about 1,200 people on Oct. 7. That number is expected to climb significantly during a full-scale offensive in Rafah, where Israel says four remaining Hamas battalions are ensconced.

In addition to military support, the United States has used its veto several times since the war erupted to provide Israel with diplomatic cover at the United Nations. On Friday, it was among just nine countries, including Israel, to vote against a UN General Assembly resolution that called on the Security Council to “favorably” reconsider the Palestinian application for membership.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

QOSHE - US says Israel’s weapons use in Gaza likely ‘inconsistent’ with international law - Elizabeth Hagedorn
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

US says Israel’s weapons use in Gaza likely ‘inconsistent’ with international law

44 0
11.05.2024

WASHINGTON — A State Department report Friday on Israel’s military conduct in the Gaza Strip said it was “reasonable to assess” that US-provided weapons have been used in violation of international humanitarian law but that there was not sufficient evidence to support withholding military assistance.

Israel had not shared enough information to verify whether US arms were “specifically used” in alleged violations of international humanitarian or human rights law since Oct. 7, the report said.

The highly anticipated report to Congress, which looked at possible violations through late April, nonetheless said it considered Israel’s assurances about its compliance with international humanitarian law to be “credible and reliable.”

It came to the same conclusion about the six other US arms recipients who are engaged in active armed conflict — Colombia, Iraq, Kenya, Nigeria, Somalia and Ukraine.

A senior State Department official describing the report said the nature of the conflict in Gaza made it difficult to assess individual incidents and noted that Israel has opened a number of criminal investigations into possible violations.

The first-of-its-kind report to Congress was required under a Feb. 8 directive issued by President Joe Biden, who was facing pressure from congressional Democrats concerned that US weaponry was contributing to the........

© Al Monitor


Get it on Google Play