By Milt Harris ——Bio and Archives--April 16, 2024

Cover Story | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

In a world where depravity of thought is rampant, and morals are disintegrating sexual and deviant anomalies begin to increase. Like borders that define the boundaries of a country, morals define the boundaries of society.

Last week the National Post reported that a Canadian court ruled unanimously that the taxpayers of the city of Ontario must fund one resident’s selfish surgery to construct a vagina while leaving his penis intact.

The court ruled that the city's refusal to pay for this absurd request violated the Charter for personal security. According to the Government of Canada's website, the Charter refers to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which was created in 1982 and is part of the country's constitution.

The National Post reported that woke Judge Breese Davies, one of the judges involved wrote:

To understand how absurd this ruling is consider this simple fact. A hermaphrodite is a sexually reproducing organism that produces both male and female gametes. Animal species in which individuals are of different sexes, either male or female but not both, are gonochoric, which is the opposite of hermaphroditic.

Human beings are not hermaphrodites. Hermaphrodites don't exist. That outdated term implies that a person is both fully male and entirely female, which isn't biologically possible. This court’s ruling does nothing but fuel the insanity of the left.

It is outrageous that a court in a civilized country would punish rational people to satisfy the preposterous whims of a self-absorbed fool. This is not the proper interpretation of a charter that is supposed to protect “human rights.” This is a violation of human rights to appease a growing mental sickness initiated by and embraced by the left.

According to a report by The Post, the left is considering the recent court ruling as a victory, as it may lead to the expansion of coverage for "bottom surgery" for individuals who identify as non-binary, meaning they do not identify solely as male or female. The plaintiff in the case, referred to as K.S. in court documents, filed a lawsuit against the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) in 2022 after being denied coverage for the requested procedure, which they claimed was a necessary part of his gender reassignment.

The acceptance of absurdity is a sign of a society imploding. The court of law in question failed to uphold the law. The court's ruling disregarded scientific facts and truth, instead relying on the opinions of a select few who were able to exert political influence.

This is a farcical ruling, and every judge involved in this court needs to be recalled if possible and, at the very least, placed under extreme scrutiny. What a sickening miscarriage of justice and common sense.

Support Canada Free Press

View Comments

Milt spent thirty years as a sales and operations manager for an international manufacturing company. He is also a four-time published author on a variety of subjects. Now, he spends most of his time researching and writing about conservative politics and liberal folly.

Link, Bookmark, Share, Subscribe, Donate

QOSHE - Taxpayers Footing The Bill For A Freak That Wants To Be Both Man And Woman - Milt Harris
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

Taxpayers Footing The Bill For A Freak That Wants To Be Both Man And Woman

16 4
16.04.2024

By Milt Harris ——Bio and Archives--April 16, 2024

Cover Story | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

In a world where depravity of thought is rampant, and morals are disintegrating sexual and deviant anomalies begin to increase. Like borders that define the boundaries of a country, morals define the boundaries of society.

Last week the National Post reported that a Canadian court ruled unanimously that the taxpayers of the city of Ontario must fund one resident’s selfish surgery to construct a vagina while leaving his penis intact.

The court ruled that the city's refusal to pay for this absurd request violated the Charter for personal security. According to the Government of Canada's website, the Charter refers........

© Canada Free Press


Get it on Google Play