On the heels of Earth Day, with scientists confirming last year was the hottest year on record, it is heartening to know that positive economic impacts of investments in clean energy — a reported $240 billion in clean energy funding and 170,000 jobs from the Inflation Reduction Act alone — are starting to be felt.

In the Finger Lakes the magnitude of global climate change came home to us in early June last year when heavy, acrid smoke from Canadian wildfires found its way to our front doors. The smoke did not let up for days while families tried to figure out how to protect the health of their children and other vulnerable family members.

Elsewhere, Americans have endured alarming weather and climate extremes including wildfires, droughts, flooding, storms, and record precipitation. Climate change is undeniably affecting Americans in every state. The issue isn’t just a domestic one, of course. Climate change is getting worse because of the ongoing actions of big polluters, many of which are countries the U.S. conducts trade with. They’re pumping Earth’s atmosphere full of carbon pollution, leading to a warmer world and more extreme weather.

As individuals, we sometimes have no choice but to drive a gas car to work or heat our homes with fossil fuels so our families are warm during winter. We can do our best to make climate-friendly choices, transitioning to clean energy and taking responsibility for reducing our individual carbon footprints. But the carbon footprints of the world’s biggest polluters dwarf our own, and they must be held accountable. In short: Polluters should pay.

It’s a simple idea — and most Americans already support it. A recent poll revealed that 76% of Americans think large industrial polluters should pay for the destructive emissions that overheat the planet and tarnish our air. According to the 2023 Yale Climate Opinion Maps, 68% of adult residents in Ontario County, 67% in Seneca and 64% in Wayne and Yates County support taxing fossil fuel companies while equally reducing other taxes. The same idea should hold true for our trading partners on the international stage.

And of course, America should do everything possible to reduce our country’s own carbon pollution. We’re heading in the right direction — U.S. emissions declined 1.9% in 2023 (Rhodium Group), and our economy produces fewer emissions during manufacturing than similar industries overseas. Yet foreign polluters with lower environmental standards can undercut American manufacturers without penalty.

Increasingly, countries are moving to hold polluters accountable, often through trade. With 30% of global emissions presently generated by the production and transport of exported and imported goods, it’s a great place to start.

The E.U. and the U.K. have begun the process of imposing a carbon border adjustment mechanism to collect a fee at the border from high-polluting countries that undercut their domestic manufacturers with cheaper, carbon-heavy products.

This policy idea has bipartisan appeal in the U.S., too, since 75% of U.S. imports come from countries that produce more carbon pollution than the products we make here at home. In November 2023, Republican Senators Cassidy and Graham introduced the Foreign Pollution Fee Act. Just weeks later, Democrats in the House and Senate reintroduced the Clean Competition Act.

Both bills propose a fee on key materials such as aluminum, cement, iron and steel, and fossil fuels based on their carbon pollution. These policies would level the playing field by charging dirty importers for the difference between their high-emission products and our cleaner, domestic goods — and incentivize other countries to do better.

They also include measures intended to exempt developing nations from some or all of the carbon price to avoid damaging the economies of poorer countries that are not responsible for most of the world’s carbon pollution.

It’s clear that with a little compromise, legislators can introduce bipartisan CBAM policy that appeals to both sides of the aisle. And they should because when big polluters get a free pass to harm the planet, they cost our communities dearly. It’s time for our nation to ensure they pay a price.

Mark Reynolds is the Executive Director of Citizens’ Climate Lobby and Alice Shoemaker is a local volunteer with the NY Southern Tier Finger Lakes Chapter of CCL from Dundee.

QOSHE - GUEST APPEARANCE: Polluters should pay - Alice Shoemaker And Mark Reynolds
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

GUEST APPEARANCE: Polluters should pay

42 0
04.05.2024

On the heels of Earth Day, with scientists confirming last year was the hottest year on record, it is heartening to know that positive economic impacts of investments in clean energy — a reported $240 billion in clean energy funding and 170,000 jobs from the Inflation Reduction Act alone — are starting to be felt.

In the Finger Lakes the magnitude of global climate change came home to us in early June last year when heavy, acrid smoke from Canadian wildfires found its way to our front doors. The smoke did not let up for days while families tried to figure out how to protect the health of their children and other vulnerable family members.

Elsewhere, Americans have endured alarming weather and climate extremes including wildfires, droughts, flooding, storms, and record precipitation. Climate change is undeniably affecting Americans in every state. The issue isn’t just a domestic one, of course. Climate change is getting worse because of the ongoing actions of big polluters, many of which are countries the U.S. conducts trade with. They’re pumping Earth’s atmosphere full of carbon........

© Finger Lakes Times


Get it on Google Play