The track record of a few of the promoter-driven banks in India over the past couple of decades would make any regulator cautious. While some have done exceptionally well, Bandhan, which graduated from micro-finance institutions (MFI), is muddling along. It’s the casualties — whether a Global Trust Bank or a Yes Bank — that tell us not all promoters are fit and proper. In fact, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has been reluctant to allow even strong non-banking financial companies (NBFC) to become banks if they are a part of any business group. Against this backdrop, the RBI came out with the eligibility norms for small finance banks (SFB) to transition to universal banks. While eight of the 12 SFBs were earlier MFIs, they are gradually de-risking themselves and have forayed into secured products — home, gold, micro, small and medium enterprise, and vehicle loans. That has lowered the share of microfinance credit to about a third of the book at the end of March 2023 from 40% in March 2020. This is an encouraging signal because a lender like Bandhan Bank has suffered because it is yet to shed its microfinance bias.

But SFBs, too, are coming out of a very rough patch. Since their borrowers are financially weaker, delinquencies rose sharply during the pandemic, driving down profits and, in some instances, causing losses. If their accounts look much better today, it is partly due to substantial write-offs. Many SFBs were compelled to raise growth capital after the pandemic. Going by the eligibility criteria, as of now only AU Small Finance makes the cut. Apart from a set of financial parameters, the RBI will also assess the qualitative criteria of a satisfactory five-year track record. Though some have criticised the subjective element in such assessments, it is very much required because numbers tell just one part of the story. In fact, the requirement that an SFB should have been profitable only in the last two financial years seems rather lenient; four years would have been more appropriate.

Also Read

Will RBI cut rates before the US Fed? Elara Capital says rates may be on hold on inflation worries

Again, the SFB needs to have a reported net NPA (non-performing assets) ratio of less than 1% in the last two financial years. That, again, seems lenient; the net NPA ratio should be read together with the extent of write-offs and recoveries during the period. In fact, going by March 2023 data, several of the SFBs are ineligible to transition because they fail to meet the NPA ratio criterion and also because the portfolios are not diversified enough. Of course, some of this would have changed in FY24; AU SFB, Equitas, and Jana have less than 20% exposure to MFIs. To that extent, SFBs are already competing with universal banks.

Also Read

Rooftop solar: Chasing the sun

Internet economy should embrace NaaS

Fifth column by Tavleen Singh: Robin Hood economics

Trading with Pakistan

A licence to become a full-fledged bank would enable SFBs to offer more products and also to mop up more current account, savings account (CASA) deposits. In September 2023, the share of CASA deposit for SFBs was 27% compared with 38% for universal banks. That would help lift their net interest margins, which fell from 8.7% in FY20 to 7.5% in FY23. However, the regulator must vet the candidates carefully because we simply cannot afford any more failures. Also, competition merely for the sake of it cannot be good. Rather than create many small banks, which cannot compete effectively and run the risk of failing, it’s better the RBI facilitates mergers of relatively weak SFBs with strong banks. That would help banks pursue the goals of financial inclusion.

The track record of a few of the promoter-driven banks in India over the past couple of decades would make any regulator cautious. While some have done exceptionally well, Bandhan, which graduated from micro-finance institutions (MFI), is muddling along. It’s the casualties — whether a Global Trust Bank or a Yes Bank — that tell us not all promoters are fit and proper. In fact, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has been reluctant to allow even strong non-banking financial companies (NBFC) to become banks if they are a part of any business group. Against this backdrop, the RBI came out with the eligibility norms for small finance banks (SFB) to transition to universal banks. While eight of the 12 SFBs were earlier MFIs, they are gradually de-risking themselves and have forayed into secured products — home, gold, micro, small and medium enterprise, and vehicle loans. That has lowered the share of microfinance credit to about a third of the book at the end of March 2023 from 40% in March 2020. This is an encouraging signal because a lender like Bandhan Bank has suffered because it is yet to shed its microfinance bias.

But SFBs, too, are coming out of a very rough patch. Since their borrowers are financially weaker, delinquencies rose sharply during the pandemic, driving down profits and, in some instances, causing losses. If their accounts look much better today, it is partly due to substantial write-offs. Many SFBs were compelled to raise growth capital after the pandemic. Going by the eligibility criteria, as of now only AU Small Finance makes the cut. Apart from a set of financial parameters, the RBI will also assess the qualitative criteria of a satisfactory five-year track record. Though some have criticised the subjective element in such assessments, it is very much required because numbers tell just one part of the story. In fact, the requirement that an SFB should have been profitable only in the last two financial years seems rather lenient; four years would have been more appropriate.

Again, the SFB needs to have a reported net NPA (non-performing assets) ratio of less than 1% in the last two financial years. That, again, seems lenient; the net NPA ratio should be read together with the extent of write-offs and recoveries during the period. In fact, going by March 2023 data, several of the SFBs are ineligible to transition because they fail to meet the NPA ratio criterion and also because the portfolios are not diversified enough. Of course, some of this would have changed in FY24; AU SFB, Equitas, and Jana have less than 20% exposure to MFIs. To that extent, SFBs are already competing with universal banks.

A licence to become a full-fledged bank would enable SFBs to offer more products and also to mop up more current account, savings account (CASA) deposits. In September 2023, the share of CASA deposit for SFBs was 27% compared with 38% for universal banks. That would help lift their net interest margins, which fell from 8.7% in FY20 to 7.5% in FY23. However, the regulator must vet the candidates carefully because we simply cannot afford any more failures. Also, competition merely for the sake of it cannot be good. Rather than create many small banks, which cannot compete effectively and run the risk of failing, it’s better the RBI facilitates mergers of relatively weak SFBs with strong banks. That would help banks pursue the goals of financial inclusion.

Get live Share Market updates, Stock Market Quotes, and the latest India News and business news on Financial Express. Download the Financial Express App for the latest finance news.

The Ministry of Railways recently shared a tweet showcasing the Vande Bharat Express gliding through picturesque landscapes in Thrissur, Kerala. This state-of-the-art train, designed and manufactured domestically, represents a significant leap in India’s railway infrastructure. With its futuristic design, advanced technology, and top speed of 160 kmph.

QOSHE - Tread with caution: RBI should subject SFBs to stringent assessment before graduating them to universal banks - The Financial Express
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

Tread with caution: RBI should subject SFBs to stringent assessment before graduating them to universal banks

25 1
01.05.2024

The track record of a few of the promoter-driven banks in India over the past couple of decades would make any regulator cautious. While some have done exceptionally well, Bandhan, which graduated from micro-finance institutions (MFI), is muddling along. It’s the casualties — whether a Global Trust Bank or a Yes Bank — that tell us not all promoters are fit and proper. In fact, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has been reluctant to allow even strong non-banking financial companies (NBFC) to become banks if they are a part of any business group. Against this backdrop, the RBI came out with the eligibility norms for small finance banks (SFB) to transition to universal banks. While eight of the 12 SFBs were earlier MFIs, they are gradually de-risking themselves and have forayed into secured products — home, gold, micro, small and medium enterprise, and vehicle loans. That has lowered the share of microfinance credit to about a third of the book at the end of March 2023 from 40% in March 2020. This is an encouraging signal because a lender like Bandhan Bank has suffered because it is yet to shed its microfinance bias.

But SFBs, too, are coming out of a very rough patch. Since their borrowers are financially weaker, delinquencies rose sharply during the pandemic, driving down profits and, in some instances, causing losses. If their accounts look much better today, it is partly due to substantial write-offs. Many SFBs were compelled to raise growth capital after the pandemic. Going by the eligibility criteria, as of now only AU Small Finance makes the cut. Apart from a set of financial parameters, the RBI will also assess the qualitative criteria of a satisfactory five-year track record. Though some have criticised the subjective element in such assessments, it is very much required because numbers tell just one part of the story. In fact, the requirement that an SFB should have been profitable only in the last two........

© The Financial Express


Get it on Google Play