By Hymie Rubenstein ——Bio and Archives--December 25, 2023

Cover Story | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

On October 27, 2022, Leah Gazan, a New Democrat member of Canada’s federal parliament and the half-Indigenous daughter of a Holocaust survivor, succeeded in getting the following motion unanimously passed by the House of Commons without debate and without presenting any evidence to back it up:

Related:

Not content with getting that spurious motion passed, Gazan raised the bar in February 2023 by proposing the enactment of legislation to criminalize denial that genocide took place at these residential schools, an even more illegitimate effort than false genocide charges given Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms protection of unpopular speech along with the absence of evidence of even a single Indian Residential School child murdered by a staff member during the 113 years the schools were government-funded institutions.

According to Gazan, “Denying genocide is a form of hate speech …. That kind of speech is violent and re-traumatizes those who attended residential school."

Always eager to label Canada a genocidal nation, the former federal minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations, Marc Miller, quickly said he would be interested in reviewing any proposed legislation.

A recent episode in this saga occurred on June 16, 2023, when special interlocutor on the missing children, unmarked graves, and burial sites, Kimberly Murray released her interim report arguing “urgent consideration” should be given to legal mechanisms to combat residential school denialism.

Unsurprisingly, her “opening words” to the report state, "my role is to give voice to the children. It is not to be neutral or objective – it is to be a fierce and fearless advocate to ensure that the bodies and Spirits of the missing children are treated with the care, respect, and dignity that they deserve” even if that “conflicts with my responsibility to function independently and impartially, in a non-partisan and transparent way.”

This attack on the fundamental precepts of objective search for truth based on reason, logic, and scientific evidence – rooted in a paradigm clash between Western and Indigenous ways of knowing – gave her leave to label denialism as an “attack” whenever there were announcements of the discovery of possible unmarked graves.

This [sic] violence is prolific,” the report said. “And takes place via email, telephone, social media, op-eds and, at times, through in-person confrontations.”

She offered several examples of this “violence,” including one that followed the May 2021 burial announcement by the Kamloops Indian Band with individuals entering the secured site itself: “Some came in the middle of the night, carrying shovels; they said they wanted to ‘see for themselves’ if children are buried there. Denialists also attacked the community on social media.”

This assertion was made with no independent evidence or proof that the shovel bearers were not themselves Kamloops band members curious about at a site that was enclosed by a chain-link fence soon after the discovery was made. This prompted investigative journalist Terry Glavin to argue that:

Moral certainty based on Indigenous ways of knowing, not objective evidence based on Western science, allowed Kimberly Murray to state Canada has a role in combatting this denialism by giving “urgent consideration” to what legal tools exist to address the problem, including civil and criminal sanctions.

They have the evidence. The photos of burials. The records that prove that kids died. It is on their shoulders,” Murray told a crowd gathered on the Cowessess Indian Reserve in Saskatchewan on June 16.

But there is no photographic evidence of IRS children buried beside the shuttered Kamloops Indian Residential Schools nor at any other former Indigenous schools in Canada.

The only photographic evidence available are of regular church burials and of thousands of happy school children. As for the records, they show that the few residential school children who died at the schools were buried in school cemeteries beside buried school staff or in reserve cemeteries belonging to other bands. But most deceased children were interred on their home reserves instead. All received a proper Christian burial after succumbed to a contagious disease like tuberculosis over which Indigenous people have little natural immunity.

Several contrarians have long argued that there are few truly missing students, only lost or missing records about their school attendance and demise. On March 21, 2023, Kimberly Murray, perhaps inadvertently, confirmed this assertion in her testimony before the federal government Standing Senate Committee on Indigenous Peoples when she said:

Though there is no evidence that thousands of children’s deaths were unreported to their parents – and lots of evidence that this is not true, including the refusal of the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation to remove children whose cause of death and place of burial have been found from its Memorial Register, a list now totalling over 4,100 named and unnamed “children who never returned home from residential schools” – Murray’s statement contradicts the established public narrative about missing children.

Justice Minister David Lametti, who appointed Murray to her role and joined the June 16 event in Cowessess First Nation via video conference, bending a knee like other Liberal apparatchiks to every Indigenous whim and fancy regardless of how illogical or groundless they may be, said that he is open to all possibilities of fighting residential-school denialism, including, “a legal solution and outlawing it.” He added that Canada can look to other countries that have criminalized Holocaust denial.



Looking to other countries is necessary because Holocaust denial as such is not illegal in Canada unless it can be shown to deliberately foment antisemitism. But this Liberal government has little love for legal niceties, especially regarding Indigenous demands. It is, therefore, likely that there will be an attempt to make Indian Residential School denialism a crime regardless of its motives or effects while allowing anyone to freely claim the Holocaust is a myth unless it “willfully promotes antisemitism.”

The latest anti-denialist effort emanated from the Canadian Senate Standing Committee on Indigenous Peoples which released a 30-page report on July 19 titled “Honouring the Children Who Never Came Home: Truth, Education and Reconciliation.” The study recommends “that the Government of Canada take every action necessary to combat the rise of residential school denialism.”

According to lawyer John Carpay, president of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms:

“The use of state resources to promote one opinion on a scientific or historical matter is nakedly totalitarian. Apart from that, the senators’ aggressive language calling on government to “take every action necessary” suggests that it would be okay for the government to punish the likes of Michelle Stirling, Mark DeWolf, and others who dare to disagree with the dominant narrative.”

The report fails to define “denialism” yet claims it “serves to distract people from the horrific consequences of Residential Schools and the realities of missing children, burials, and unmarked graves.” This suggests that “denialism” means disagreeing with the dominant narrative that Indian Residential Schools were houses of horror marked by racism and genocide.

Decades of Aboriginal-style blood libel assertions hang over all these claims, with an army of activists and their supporters its eager propagandists.

Hymie Rubenstein, a retired professor of anthropology at the University of Manitoba, is editor of —REAL Indigenous Report.

Like what you see and read?
Link, Bookmark, Share, Subscribe.
If you can, Donate.

Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2023 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2023 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement

QOSHE - Will Denying Indigenous Genocide Soon Be Punished as Hate Speech? - Hymie Rubenstein
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

Will Denying Indigenous Genocide Soon Be Punished as Hate Speech?

6 1
26.12.2023

By Hymie Rubenstein ——Bio and Archives--December 25, 2023

Cover Story | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

On October 27, 2022, Leah Gazan, a New Democrat member of Canada’s federal parliament and the half-Indigenous daughter of a Holocaust survivor, succeeded in getting the following motion unanimously passed by the House of Commons without debate and without presenting any evidence to back it up:

Related:

Not content with getting that spurious motion passed, Gazan raised the bar in February 2023 by proposing the enactment of legislation to criminalize denial that genocide took place at these residential schools, an even more illegitimate effort than false genocide charges given Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms protection of unpopular speech along with the absence of evidence of even a single Indian Residential School child murdered by a staff member during the 113 years the schools were government-funded institutions.

According to Gazan, “Denying genocide is a form of hate speech …. That kind of speech is violent and re-traumatizes those who attended residential school."

Always eager to label Canada a genocidal nation, the former federal minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations, Marc Miller, quickly said he would be interested in reviewing any proposed legislation.

A recent episode in this saga occurred on June 16, 2023, when special interlocutor on the missing children, unmarked graves, and burial sites, Kimberly Murray released her interim report arguing “urgent consideration” should be given to legal mechanisms to combat residential school denialism.

Unsurprisingly, her “opening words” to the report state, "my role is to give voice to the children. It is not to be neutral or objective – it is to be a fierce and fearless advocate to ensure that the bodies and Spirits of the missing children are treated with the care, respect, and dignity that they deserve” even if that “conflicts with my responsibility to function independently and impartially, in a non-partisan and........

© Canada Free Press


Get it on Google Play