I WILL be voting Yes and Yes in the upcoming referendum. I welcome the Government’s attempt to deal with this thorny issue.

There has been more than 30 years of discussion on how to change or delete article 41.2. I find it gratuitously offensive. I find it offensive because it socialised both women and men to see a woman’s primary place as in the home. It further socialised people to see women as there to service other’s needs.

It also put the responsibility of care and housework in the home squarely on women’s shoulders.

I grew up in the 1960s and ’70s. My mother gave up her job as a dress-maker when my brother was born. I was born three years later and that was our family. She didn’t talk about whether she wanted more children or not.

In those days, contraception was difficult to get, if not illegal or certainly frowned upon. She stayed at home while my father went to work as a carpenter. They were happily married and worked as a team. My father gave my mother his pay-packet every Friday. She paid the bills and bought the groceries.

As I remember it, they discussed everything and decisions were made by the both of them. However, my mother would have said to me ‘Always have your running away money’.

She recognised the economic disadvantage that she was at by having to depend on my father’s goodwill.

Sadly, she died in 1985 and we never really got to discuss the social progress that has been made in Ireland for women.

In canvassing for a Yes vote on March 8, I meet women who’s husbands are not so fair-minded. They basically have to accept their lot in order to remain married.

I’ve also met men who are appalled by the fact that their wives were forced to give up their jobs. It subsequently negatively impacted their wives when it came to pension entitlement. They fundamentally understood that to be deprived of the right to access paid work was an appalling injustice.

It put the onus on the man to be the breadwinner. It further embedded the idea that public leadership was a place for men only.

I would argue that the infamous comment of Padraig Flynn that Mary Robinson was essentially neglecting her family when she ran for President comes from that outdated thinking.

Even today, on Cork City council there is a significant gender imbalance, with only six women councillors to 25 men.

I recently received a print-out from a 1950s Home Economics book (previously known as domestic science and almost exclusively taught to girls). I was out for dinner with some friends and we were amused by this. However, as one of them pointed out, this was how her mother treated her father.

Under the headline ‘Tips to look after your husband’, the book has categories such as ‘Have Dinner Ready’, ‘Prepare Yourself’, ‘Clear Away the Clutter’, ‘Prepare the Children’, ‘Minimise all Noise’, ‘Make Him Comfortable’, ‘Listen to Him’, and ‘Make the Evening His’.

Under a section headlined ‘Some don’ts’, it advises women not to greet their husband with problems or complaints, and “don’t complain if he’s late for dinner. Count this as minor compared with what he might have gone through that day”.We have come such a long way; I think we are in danger of forgetting just how regressive Irish society has been for women.

While there is criticism that the new wording on care in the referendum is not strong enough, I would argue that to vote No does nothing to help in this regard. It could be interpreted that a woman’s place is in the home and that she should be confined there.

Some jurisdictions do implement this world view of women. Thankfully, that has changed in Ireland, but progressive thinking is not necessarily irreversible. There are plenty of countries that I would not like to live in because of their attitude on this topic.

On the second referendum question about recognising families that are not based on marriage, my own is one. I am not married to my daughter’s dad. We live separately and have parented her together but have remained unmarried to one another. We come together at least weekly and for birthdays, Christmas and other celebrations. People are often amused at how well we get on.

However, as my daughter has pointed out, we get on so well because we don’t live together.

The soap opera view of romance is often short-lived. As my 96-year-old aunt says, ‘love is blind and marriage is an eye-opener’.

In her book The Invisible Job, Paula Fyans describes the complexity of managing a home and family. She puts a business language on it and describes how there is a Project Manager and a zero hours contractor. No prizes for guessing who does what. She suggests ways to share the work involved and remain happily married.

I, for one, am very glad that the view of living with another person is more realistic nowadays. Most married people will say it has it’s ups and downs and it takes commitment on both sides to make it work. I think our constitution should reflect that reality.

It does not take away from marriage, but it does recognise the lived experience of people like me whose family is not based on marriage.

For all these reasons, I will be voting Yes Yes on Friday, March 8.

More in this section

QOSHE - Why I will be voting Yes/Yes on Friday, March 8 - Evening Echo
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

Why I will be voting Yes/Yes on Friday, March 8

11 1
28.02.2024

I WILL be voting Yes and Yes in the upcoming referendum. I welcome the Government’s attempt to deal with this thorny issue.

There has been more than 30 years of discussion on how to change or delete article 41.2. I find it gratuitously offensive. I find it offensive because it socialised both women and men to see a woman’s primary place as in the home. It further socialised people to see women as there to service other’s needs.

It also put the responsibility of care and housework in the home squarely on women’s shoulders.

I grew up in the 1960s and ’70s. My mother gave up her job as a dress-maker when my brother was born. I was born three years later and that was our family. She didn’t talk about whether she wanted more children or not.

In those days, contraception was difficult to get, if not illegal or certainly frowned upon. She stayed at home while my father went to work as a carpenter. They were happily married and worked as a team. My father gave my mother his pay-packet every Friday. She paid the bills and bought the groceries.

As I remember it, they discussed everything and decisions were made by the both of them. However, my mother would have said to me ‘Always have your running away money’.

She recognised the economic disadvantage that she was at by having to........

© Evening Echo


Get it on Google Play