Let us start with a simple question: Which state do you think is most productive in terms of value creation in agriculture on a per hectare (ha) basis? If Punjab comes to mind, you are very off the mark. Punjab, known for its high physical productivity of rice and wheat, falls at number 13 amongst Indian states when it comes to agri-value created — agri-GDP on a per ha basis. There could be at least two ways to estimate it. First, divide state agri-GDP by Net Sown Area (NSA); and second, divide agri-GDP by Gross Cropped Area (GCA), which encompasses the effect of cropping intensity. Here we use both indicators for the year 2021-22, for which the latest information is available.

When we look at agri-GDP/ha through the NSA, Andhra Pradesh (AP) leads the pack with Rs 6.43 lakh/ha, followed closely by West Bengal (WB) with Rs 5.19 lakh/ha, Tamil Nadu (TN) with Rs 5.14 lakh/ha, and so on. Punjab ranks 13th with Rs 3.71 lakh/ha, with Jharkhand trailing at Rs 4.41 lakh/ha. And if that wasn’t enough of a reality check, the disparity becomes starker when we consider agri-GDP/ha of GCA. In this regard, Bihar with Rs 2.18 lakh/ha, Odisha with Rs 2.57/ha, and Assam with Rs 2.34/ha outpace Punjab with Rs 1.92 lakh/ha (see infographic).

What sets these states ahead of Punjab in terms of value added in agriculture is that they have chosen a diversified production basket geared towards high-value products, largely staying away from heavy reliance on the Minimum Support Price (MSP) system.

Punjab, caught up in a rice-wheat system induced by the MSP regime and open-ended procurement, along with free power and highly subsidised fertilisers, failed to diversify to high-value agriculture. This is despite repeated reminders by the Johl Committee report in 1986, and again in 2002. Today, 84 per cent of Punjab’s GCA is under wheat and rice, leading to 76 per cent of its blocks being over-exploited in terms of groundwater.

It is late, but never too late, to switch gears. Punjab and Haryana desperately need a new deal to move away from rice cultivation. Just to save Punjab and Haryana from ecological disaster, a minimum of 1.5 million hectares (Mha) of rice area (out of about 4.5 Mha) needs to be shifted to pulses, oilseeds, and even maize for poultry and ethanol, and fruits and vegetables. For this to happen, crop-neutral incentive structures need to be created. What this means is that the growers of these alternative crops must be rewarded by about Rs 25,000/ha when they switch from paddy to these crops, as that is the minimum savings from power and fertiliser subsidies. This package towards sustainable cropping patterns needs to be devised by the Centre and states together on a 50:50 basis.

But if farmers’ incomes have to be augmented substantially, Punjab and Haryana have plenty of lessons to learn from states that have already diversified into high-value agriculture. In this context, it is interesting to note that the Andhra farmer creates 74 per cent more value in agriculture than his Punjabi counterpart on per ha of NSA. How did that happen?

The answer lies in high-value inland fisheries. With 24 per cent of its agriculture value added (AGVA) attributed to fisheries, AP leads the nation in fish production, contributing 30 per cent to its national output. It is this proficiency in cultivating high-value shrimp that boosts their profitability. This success story of AP serves as a compelling example for Punjab and Haryana if they want to switch from rice-wheat rotation.

Tamil Nadu sets a high bar for fruit cultivation, with mangoes and bananas comprising over 80 per cent of its fruit production in 2020-21. This success translates into a 39 per cent higher value creation in agriculture compared to their counterparts in Punjab. It is a clear signpost for Punjabi farmers’ higher income aspirations. But it is not just about diversifying into horticulture; it is also about embracing innovative agricultural practices.

For example, TN farmers practise Ultra High-Density Plantation (UHDP) for mangoes. This method allows 674 mango trees per acre compared to the traditional method of 40 only. This translates to a significant increase in yield and profits. This technique, being promoted by Jain Irrigation, leads to significant water savings (up to 50 per cent) and fertiliser savings (up to 30 per cent), further enhancing profitability.

West Bengal, a state with only 2 per cent agriculture power consumption in 2021-22, creates 40 per cent more value than Punjab, which gets free power for agriculture. WB cultivates vegetables on 15 per cent (1.5 Mha) of its GCA of 10.2 Mha. The central government’s recognition of this success is evident in the establishment of an Agri-Export Zone (AEZ) dedicated to vegetables in WB, encompassing three key districts: Nadia, Murshidabad, and North 24 Parganas. Year-round production of a variety of vegetables makes cropping intensity so high (199 per cent) in WB. The state has successfully transitioned from a “production-oriented” model to a more strategic “market-driven” system.

This focus on market demands is reflected in their impressive production figures for vegetables like brinjal (2.9 MMT), cabbage (2.3 MMT), cauliflower (1.9 MMT), and potato (15.1 MMT) in 2020-21 (Horticulture Statistics). Emulating West Bengal’s model necessitates identifying Punjab’s own AEZs for horticulture.

Punjab’s dairy sector, contributing 28 per cent to its Gross Value agri-Output (GVO) in 2019-20, highlights its growth potential. This presents a golden opportunity for Punjab to capitalise on its existing dairy strength by venturing into value-added processing, from cheese to chocolates, for Indian and export markets.

The path towards revitalising Indian agriculture and boosting farmers’ incomes requires moving beyond traditional staples. Punjab and Haryana need to embrace a demand-driven high-value agricultural system, if they truly want their farmers to be prosperous. This would require shedding the mindset of an MSP-based cropping system.

Gulati is Distinguished Professor and Chanda a Research Assistant at ICRIER. Views are personal

Electoral bonds failed to bring transparency or end black moneySubscriber Only

How Delhi’s Specialised Schools of Excellence are faringSubscriber Only

In Lok Sabha polls 2024, Congress hopes for a repeatSubscriber Only

Kochrab Ashram, where Gandhi became the MahatmaSubscriber Only

Lok Sabha poll: Why all eyes will be on theseSubscriber Only

Bureaucrat Amarjeet Sinha’s take on policy’s last-mile challengesSubscriber Only

UPSC Ethics Simplified | Conscience & Ethical Decision makingSubscriber Only

How small towns live the K-pop DreamSubscriber Only

Rahul Gandhi clearly has come a distance – but whatSubscriber Only

QOSHE - The path towards revitalising Indian agriculture and boosting farmers’ incomes requires moving beyond traditional staples - Ashok Gulati
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

The path towards revitalising Indian agriculture and boosting farmers’ incomes requires moving beyond traditional staples

15 1
18.03.2024

Let us start with a simple question: Which state do you think is most productive in terms of value creation in agriculture on a per hectare (ha) basis? If Punjab comes to mind, you are very off the mark. Punjab, known for its high physical productivity of rice and wheat, falls at number 13 amongst Indian states when it comes to agri-value created — agri-GDP on a per ha basis. There could be at least two ways to estimate it. First, divide state agri-GDP by Net Sown Area (NSA); and second, divide agri-GDP by Gross Cropped Area (GCA), which encompasses the effect of cropping intensity. Here we use both indicators for the year 2021-22, for which the latest information is available.

When we look at agri-GDP/ha through the NSA, Andhra Pradesh (AP) leads the pack with Rs 6.43 lakh/ha, followed closely by West Bengal (WB) with Rs 5.19 lakh/ha, Tamil Nadu (TN) with Rs 5.14 lakh/ha, and so on. Punjab ranks 13th with Rs 3.71 lakh/ha, with Jharkhand trailing at Rs 4.41 lakh/ha. And if that wasn’t enough of a reality check, the disparity becomes starker when we consider agri-GDP/ha of GCA. In this regard, Bihar with Rs 2.18 lakh/ha, Odisha with Rs 2.57/ha, and Assam with Rs 2.34/ha outpace Punjab with Rs 1.92 lakh/ha (see infographic).

What sets these states ahead of Punjab in terms of value added in agriculture is that they have chosen a diversified production basket geared towards high-value products, largely staying away from heavy reliance on the Minimum Support Price (MSP) system.

Punjab, caught up in a rice-wheat system induced by the MSP regime and open-ended procurement, along with free power and highly subsidised fertilisers, failed to diversify to high-value agriculture. This is despite........

© Indian Express


Get it on Google Play