No normal person believes serial killer Robert Pickton should be eligible for day parole just 22 years after his arrest
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre added three items to his policy book this week, each of which is likely to generate significant discussion. He supports the idea of online porn sites having to establish users’ age … though his office quickly clarified that he’s dead-set against any form of “digital ID,” so what that means in practice I have no idea. (What we do know is, kids will continue to access online porn unless their parents are vigilant about it.) And he supports the idea that “female sports, female change rooms (and) female bathrooms should be for females, not for biological males” … though he also conceded he wasn’t sure how many such “female spaces” were in any way federally regulated.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Don't have an account? Create Account
The third item is the best one, very doable and completely within federal jurisdiction. But I suspect also the one we’ll hear the least about, because it’s pretty much impossible for the other parties to use as a wedge issue.
This week we learned that Robert Pickton, almost certainly (and one must hope) Canada’s most prolific serial killer of women, had become eligible to apply for day parole on just the 22nd anniversary of his arrest — which was Thursday. In response to this objectively outrageous situation, Poilievre vowed to reintroduce legislation that would allow for longer sentences for multiple murderers than for one-offs — an idea so sensible on every level that only the Supreme Court of Canada (unanimously!) could possibly have given it the kibosh.
It also highlights one of the most maddening things about the Pickton case: Upon his six second-degree murder convictions in 2010, the Crown stayed 20 other first-degree murder charges against him.
Practically speaking, that was defensible. Many famous serial killers have only been convicted of a few of their suspected (or even admitted) crimes, because once they’re serving the maximum sentence available, there is an argument to use finite justice-system resources elsewhere and to spare victims the dread and trauma of relitigating the horrors every few years. (Families of those 20 alleged Pickton victims were divided on this front, as you can imagine: Some were happy not to relive the trauma, with Pickton locked up nominally “forever”; others yearned for justice for their friends specifically.)
This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
It’s one thing not to charge “extra” murders in the United States, where someone like Pickton — or Paul Bernardo, or Russell Williams, or Terri-Lynne McClintic — would have literally no chance of walking free ever again. It’s quite another in Canada, when a man who fed women to pigs is eligible for a day-parole hearing on horrific crimes for which he was convicted while Ratatouille and There Will Be Blood were playing in theatres.
Suggest that this is an insane situation and you will quickly fall down one of Canada’s craziest rabbit holes.
“Oh relax, he’s never getting out.”
“Then why make him eligible?”
“Corrections experts say it’s beneficial for rehabilitation to have some light at the end of the tunnel.”
“But you just said there was no light.”
The Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling striking down the so-called “stacked sentencing” leeway the Harper government had offered judges, and which a Quebec judge used to sentence Quebec City mosque killer Alexandre Bissonette to 40 years without parole, is one of the daftest, most offensive documents it has issued in recent years — and that’s saying something. The judgment rests on buck-naked falsehoods: That “the imposition of excessive sentences that fulfil no function, like the 150‑year parole ineligibility period initially sought by the Crown in this case, does nothing more than bring the administration of justice into disrepute and undermine public confidence in the rationality and fairness of the criminal justice system.” It found such sentences “contrary to the fundamental values of Canadian society.”
It’s pure fantasy. The polar opposite of the truth. Deranged. It’s one thing to say Canadian public opinion shouldn’t matter — in matters of fundamental justice, it shouldn’t. But judges can’t just be making up public opinion on the fly! A Research Co. poll conducted last year asked respondents to choose between “life imprisonment without the possibility of parole” for murder convictions, which the Canadian judiciary considers nauseatingly harsh, and capital punishment, the mere mention of which would send the judiciary to its fainting couches … and 54 per cent of us chose capital punishment! On social media this week I saw everyone from radical feminists to hang-‘em-high types deploring Pickton’s parole eligibility as an affront to reason and an insult to the families of Pickton’s victims.
Poilievre’s proposal might well have to involve the notwithstanding clause, and R v. Bissonnette cries out for its invocation. That’s not an ideal solution, University of Guelph political scientist Dennis Baker argues compellingly at The Hub, because the clause has to be reviewed every five years, and criminal sentences ought not to be. But he also argues there might be ways to offer judges more discretion in egregious cases without offending the courts. Poilievre should be leading that charge, and the charge for justice-system reform in general.
On porn and bathrooms, the Conservative leader is appealing to majority opinions and effectively goading his opponents into apoplexy. It would be nice to see him focus more on issues where he, as prime minister, could really drive serious change.
National Post
cselley@postmedia.com
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.
If you enjoy a freshly baked pizza and love spending time outdoors, you’re in for a treat. This guide will welcome you to outdoor pizza ovens, exploring various options that will help you transform your backyard into a pizzeria. Whether you’re a novice pizza chef or a seasoned outdoor cooking enthusiast, there’s something here for everyone. Visualize yourself eating the mouthwatering homemade pizzas in your outdoor space. Let’s get cooking!
The bob has been a dominate hair trend this season. Nadia Albano shares a few things to consider before making the cut.
Three buzzy new beauty products we tried this week.
Canadian chef, entrepreneur and actor Matty Matheson opts for homegrown style for red-carpet awards season.
A convenient and budget-friendly way to improve your sleep
365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4
© 2024 National Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.
This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Belen Fernandez
Mort Laitner
Rami G Khouri
Ali Fathollah-Nejad
Nikkei Editorial
visit website
