Failing to build LNG export infrastructure in the 2010s could well be one of the largest missed economic opportunities in our history

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

First Reading is a daily newsletter keeping you posted on the travails of Canadian politicos, all curated by the National Post’s own Tristin Hopper. To get an early version sent directly to your inbox, sign up here.

This week, the U.S. government announced that they were officially the world’s largest exporter of LNG in 2023. Every single day that year, U.S. ports exported the equivalent of 11.9 billion cubic feet of liquid natural gas. At current prices, that’s about $82 million worth of gas each day.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Don't have an account? Create Account

In that same year, Canada’s LNG exports were the same as they’ve always been: Zero. There are no LNG ports on the Atlantic Coast, and no solid plans to build one. Of two LNG ports under construction in B.C., the first won’t be open until 2025.

As the world clamours for natural gas like never before, the official line out of Ottawa is that Canada is missing out on the windfall entirely due to market conditions. Permits were approved, plans fell through, and the “business case” never materialized. But the example of the United States shows that Canada didn’t just miss the boat on LNG; it may have missed out on one of the largest economic opportunities in its entire history.

In 2018, a little-noticed report out of the University of Calgary outlined how Canada could become “a player” in a lucrative new era of Europe sourcing its energy from freighters filled with liquid natural gas.

Two factors were driving the continent towards LNG: EU countries were shutting down coal plants in order to meet emissions targets, and they were actively trying to cut ties with an increasingly authoritarian Russia, which was supplying almost all of Europe’s natural gas via pipeline.

This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

What the authors didn’t know is that the latter factor would be massively accelerated by Russia’s all-out invasion of Ukraine in early 2022.

The report was also written at a time when the U.S. and Canada were much closer to being on an equal footing as regards LNG exports – although the U.S. did indeed have a head start.

It had been just two years since a U.S. port had sent off its first-ever export LNG freighter in 2016, and the country had others under construction. But both countries shared ambitious plans to expand. At the time of the University of Calgary report, the Government of Canada had granted permits to five proposed LNG projects: Two in Quebec, and three in Nova Scotia.

Six years later, the U.S. has now opened six Atlantic LNG ports, while all five proposed Canadian projects have fallen through. The most recent was in November, when the Alberta company Pieridae officially pulled up stakes on its proposed Goldboro LNG project in Nova Scotia.

If everything had worked out perfectly for Canada, the five projects would have started coming online in 2022, reaching maximum capacity in 2029.

In this alternate timeline, Canada would currently have an East Coast export capacity of at least 25 billion cubic metres of natural gas per year. Canadian production probably wouldn’t be able to meet the full export capacity, but at the LNG prices the Americans were getting last year, 25 billion cubic metres would have fetched between $7.8 billion and $11 billion.

By the end of the decade, the University of Calgary analysts projected that Canadian LNG facilities on the East Coast would be able to “serve up to approximately 40 to 45 per cent of European natural gas demand from non-Russian sources.”

There’s a few geographic reasons why it’s harder to ship LNG out of Canada than the United States.

Most of Canada’s natural gas production is in the West, requiring any product to be piped much farther than any of the gas being shipped to American ports, most of which are along the Gulf Coast. Even if Canada’s dream scenario of five East Coast facilities had occurred, the report suspected they would be “supplied predominantly by U.S. natural gas in the short to medium term.”

The U.S. also had the advantage of putting their LNG facilities in regions flush with established oil and gas ports. The Canadian ones were all going to be “greenfield” developments built from scratch.

“The outlook for Canadian projects, while not exactly grim, is certainly not rosy,” it concluded.

But the report’s gist was that Canadian gas could be attractive to Europe as a “geopolitically stable and environmentally responsible” source of gas, so long as it did some work on speeding up the regulatory process.

University of Calgary economist Kent Fellows was one of the authors of the 2018 report. In a comment to National Post he said “it is very fair to ask why there is (or was) a business case on the U.S. east coast but not the Canadian east coast.”

He also pointed out the contrast between Ottawa’s laissez-faire attitude to LNG and its extremely interventionist approach to EV factories in central Canada. Last year, Ottawa offered up an unprecedented $20 billion in subsidies and tax credits to secure the construction of just two EV battery factories in Southern Ontario.

“I don’t think the Federal government can throw up their hands and say they had nothing to do with it at all,” he said.

It emerged this week at Canada’s foreign interference inquiry that the Trudeau government has been successful at prior attempts to suppress information from social media. Allen Sutherland, an assistant secretary to the cabinet at the Privy Council Office, testified to the inquiry that during the 2019 election he made a request to Facebook that they suppress circulation of a story by The Buffalo Chronicle alleging that Trudeau had an inappropriate relationship with a student while a teacher at Vancouver’s West Point Grey Academy. It’s a longstanding internet rumour, but extensive investigations by the National Post (among others) have found no evidence to support it. Regardless, Facebook suppressed the story immediately upon request. “The content might have gained significant attention were it amplified, and therefore risked threatening the integrity of the election,” read Sutherland’s witness testimony.

Get all of these insights and more into your inbox by signing up for the First Reading newsletter here.

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

From functional fitness to mainstream fashion, add this multi-faceted garment to your collection

How to prepare for the Great North American Eclipse

A list of the top films and series that should be on your radar this month

Sandy Dhami, 45, works in education and was feeling like her hair was not exceeding its potential and needed extra attention.

The easy-to-assemble sofa-in-a-box that’s comfortable and looks lovely

365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4

© 2024 National Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.

This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

You can manage saved articles in your account.

and save up to 100 articles!

You can manage your saved articles in your account and clicking the X located at the bottom right of the article.

QOSHE - Subscriber only. - Tristin Hopper
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

Subscriber only.

10 0
08.04.2024

Failing to build LNG export infrastructure in the 2010s could well be one of the largest missed economic opportunities in our history

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

First Reading is a daily newsletter keeping you posted on the travails of Canadian politicos, all curated by the National Post’s own Tristin Hopper. To get an early version sent directly to your inbox, sign up here.

This week, the U.S. government announced that they were officially the world’s largest exporter of LNG in 2023. Every single day that year, U.S. ports exported the equivalent of 11.9 billion cubic feet of liquid natural gas. At current prices, that’s about $82 million worth of gas each day.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Don't have an account? Create Account

In that same year, Canada’s LNG exports were the same as they’ve always been: Zero. There are no LNG ports on the Atlantic Coast, and no solid plans to build one. Of two LNG ports under construction in B.C., the first won’t be open until 2025.

As the world clamours for natural gas like never before, the official line out of Ottawa is that Canada is missing out on the windfall entirely due to market conditions. Permits were approved, plans fell through, and the “business case” never materialized. But the example of the United States shows that Canada didn’t just miss the boat on LNG; it may have missed out on one of the largest economic opportunities in its entire history.

In 2018, a little-noticed report out of the University of Calgary outlined how Canada could become “a player” in a lucrative new era of Europe sourcing its energy from freighters filled with liquid natural gas.

Two factors were driving the continent towards LNG: EU countries were shutting down coal plants in order to meet emissions targets, and they were actively trying to cut ties with an increasingly authoritarian Russia, which was........

© National Post


Get it on Google Play