Imagine yourself as a parent walking into your children’s bedroom to discover your 6- and 8-year-old children in a state of undress. When you enter the room, they quickly try to cover up and put their clothes back on. What do you think or do? Are you concerned? Is your reaction different if the children are 2 and 4 years old? Seven and 13 years old? Does the gender of the children matter?
Many parents in this situation dismiss the siblings’ behavior as “normal curiosity” and harmless. They may ignore the behavior or tell the children to get dressed without following up. Other parents panic, assuming the worst. They may punish and shame the children. Neither reaction is adequate for addressing sibling sexual behavior.
Unfortunately, reactions from professionals who work with children and families are often not much better. Sophie King-Hill and her colleagues characterized common practitioner reactions to sibling sexual behavior as minimization, catastrophizing, or exaggeration. Minimization is when practitioners dismiss potentially problematic or abusive sibling sexual behavior as harmless exploration. Catastrophizing is when practitioners overreact—often punitively—to sibling sexual behaviors that could be managed in the home with safety planning and supportive parents. Sometimes practitioners feel they must exaggerate the seriousness of sibling sexual behaviors to help families access needed services.
Returning to the scenario we began with, there is no simple metric for whether sexual behavior between siblings is developmentally appropriate or abusive. Some definitions of sibling sexual abuse, particularly legal definitions, specify an age gap of more than four or five years as indicating abuse. However, research with survivors has shown that sibling sexual abuse can occur even when siblings are much closer in age. Gender is certainly a factor—the most common sibling sexual abuse scenario is an older brother and a younger sister—but sibling sexual abuse can occur with any combination of sibling genders.
Peter Yates and Stuard Allardyce, leading experts in this field, recently put forward a continuum of sibling sexual behavior with four levels: (1) developmentally appropriate, (2) inappropriate, (3) problematic, and (4) abusive. This is a useful tool and demonstrates that there is a lot of grey area between developmentally appropriate sexual exploration and sibling sexual abuse.
The UK-based RCEW National Project on Sibling Sexual Abuse summarized sibling sexual abuse as “A form of harmful sexual behavior or activity involving the misuse of power and victimizing intent or outcome between children who self-identify as siblings.” Drawing from this definition and the extensive work of John Caffaro in this field, we have developed the following list of characteristics that are signs of sibling sexual abuse. Not all these signs are required for sibling sexual abuse to be suspected:
To further clarify things, we list the characteristics of developmentally appropriate exploratory sex play. In this case, all the following signs must be present to conclude that sibling sexual behavior is unlikely to be harmful:
Any sexual behaviors between siblings that don’t meet this description deserve careful investigation by a qualified professional. Families can seek help from a pediatrician, mental health clinician, school nurse, or local family resource center.
Unfortunately, research shows that children are very unlikely to disclose sibling sexual abuse during childhood or even adulthood. Some take the secret to their graves. A large factor in the secrecy is that many children feel complicit and confused about their sexual experiences with their siblings. Sometimes sibling sexual behavior starts out as exploratory and mutual but becomes coercive when one child wants to stop. Other times, siblings become sexually involved to fill intimacy needs not being met by caregivers. Even in cases involving clear coercion or force, the harmed child often blames themselves and mistakenly thinks they could have stopped it somehow.
The low chance of children’s disclosure makes it essential for adults to watch for signs and ask questions. Sibling sexual abuse has long-term negative impacts on mental, physical, and relationship health. Dafna Tener’s research has shown that even behavior perceived by children at the time as consensual or mutual can lead to emotional cut-offs later in life.
Parents should confront the uncomfortable reality of sibling sexual behavior and learn to spot the difference between exploratory sex play and potentially problematic or abusive behavior. Professionals should incorporate questions about siblings into routine screenings for child sexual abuse. Learning to identify harmful sibling dynamics will contribute to intervention for child sexual abuse and its associated secrecy and shame.
References
Caffaro, J. (2021). Sexual abuse of siblings. In T. K. Shackelford (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Domestic Violence (pp. 758–778). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529742343
King-Hill, S., Gilsenan, A., & McCartan, K. (2023). Professional responses to sibling sexual abuse. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 29(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10/gsm4cc
Tener, D. (2021). “I love and hate him in the same breath”: Relationships of adult survivors of sexual abuse with their perpetrating siblings. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13–14), NP6844–NP6866. https://doi.org/10/gsjdhr
Tener, D., & Silberstein, M. (2019). Therapeutic interventions with child survivors of sibling sexual abuse: The professionals’ perspective. Child Abuse & Neglect, 89, 192–202. https://doi.org/10/grw46x
When to Be Concerned About Sibling Sexual Behavior
18
0
08.02.2024
Imagine yourself as a parent walking into your children’s bedroom to discover your 6- and 8-year-old children in a state of undress. When you enter the room, they quickly try to cover up and put their clothes back on. What do you think or do? Are you concerned? Is your reaction different if the children are 2 and 4 years old? Seven and 13 years old? Does the gender of the children matter?
Many parents in this situation dismiss the siblings’ behavior as “normal curiosity” and harmless. They may ignore the behavior or tell the children to get dressed without following up. Other parents panic, assuming the worst. They may punish and shame the children. Neither reaction is adequate for addressing sibling sexual behavior.
Unfortunately, reactions from professionals who work with children and families are often not much better. Sophie King-Hill and her colleagues characterized common practitioner reactions to sibling sexual behavior as minimization, catastrophizing, or exaggeration. Minimization is when practitioners dismiss potentially problematic or abusive sibling sexual behavior as harmless exploration. Catastrophizing is when practitioners overreact—often punitively—to sibling sexual behaviors that could be managed in the home with safety planning and supportive parents. Sometimes practitioners feel they must exaggerate the seriousness of sibling sexual behaviors to help families access needed........
© Psychology Today
visit website
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Belen Fernandez
Rami G Khouri
Mort Laitner
Rachel Marsden
Donald Low
Bradley Blankenship
Ali Fathollah-Nejad
Nikkei Editorial
Abbas Juma
Michael Kwet
