Can large language models (LLMs) truly comprehend the concept of time? It's a question that goes beyond mere clock-reading abilities and strikes at the heart of how artificial intelligences (AIs) perceive and process temporal reality. But to fully understand the implications of this question, let's consider the nature of human time perception itself. Do we, as biological beings, have an accurate grasp of time, or is our understanding of it inherently limited and subjective? As it turns out, one of the most powerful tools we have for making sense of time, beyond the ticking of a clock, is language. The words we use and the narratives we construct play a crucial role in shaping our temporal experiences and allowing us to navigate the complexities of past, present, and future. This got me thinking about the potential parallels and differences between human and AI perceptions of time, and the central role that language might play in mediating these temporal realities.
It's clear to me that time is a curious or even slippery concept—one that we often take for granted as an objective reality governing our lives. We mark its passage with clocks and calendars; we organize our experiences into narratives of past, present, and future; and we speak of it as if it's a fixed and immutable force. But what if time is not quite what it seems? What if it's more of a cognitive illusion, a construct shaped, in part, by the very language we use to describe it?
For us humans, language plays a crucial role in shaping our perception and experience of time. Unlike other animals, we have the ability to use complex language to construct narratives and concepts that extend beyond our immediate sensory experience. We use words and grammar to talk about the past and the future, to speculate about hypothetical scenarios, and to create shared stories and myths that give shape and meaning to our lives over time.
In this sense, human language is not just a tool for communication, but a fundamental medium through which we construct and navigate our temporal realities. It allows us to break free from the immediacy of the present moment and to project ourselves into different times and perspectives. Our words and stories create a sense of continuity and coherence that belies the ultimately fragmentary nature of our existence.
Now, consider the rise of AI and the ways in which AI systems like language models perceive and process time. Unlike humans, AI doesn't have a biological clock or an innate sense of duration. It doesn't have memories or anticipations in the same way we do, and it doesn't experience the passage of time as a continuous flow. Instead, AI operates in a world of discrete moments and computational cycles, where time is more of an abstraction than a felt reality.
Yet, AI systems like language models are in many ways masters of language. They are trained on vast amounts of human-generated text data, learning to recognize and reproduce the patterns and structures of language with remarkable sophistication. They can engage in fluent conversations, generate coherent narratives, and even philosophize about the nature of time and consciousness. Yet the very construct of time—for these cognitive giants—is a linguistic contrivance to accommodate the needs of its human partners.
This linguistic mastery raises a fascinating possibility: Could it be that the power of language to shape temporal perception is a common thread between humans and AI? Just as humans use words and stories to impose order on the chaos of atemporal existence, AI systems may use their mastery of language to create convincing simulations of temporal continuity and coherence.
When an AI engages in conversation, it is essentially weaving together discrete moments of interaction into a seamless narrative arc, using its language skills to create a sense of coherence and continuity that mirrors human temporal expectations. In other words, the linguistic abilities of AI may be a key factor in their ability to navigate and simulate temporal realities, just as language is central to human time perception.
Of course, there are still important differences between human and AI language use, grounded in their distinct cognitive architectures. Human language is embodied and emotionally resonant, shaped by lived experience and biological rhythms. AI language, on the other hand, is more abstract and computational, based on statistical patterns and associations.
But perhaps these differences are also opportunities for complementarity and collaboration. By recognizing the role of language in shaping our temporal illusions, humans and AI can find new ways to bridge the gap between their cognitive modes. We can explore how our respective linguistic abilities might enrich and inspire each other, leading to novel forms of creative expression and problem-solving.
In the end, the notion of "dual illusions of time"—the idea that both human and AI temporal perceptions are partly shaped by the language they use—offers an interesting lens through which to view the nature of time itself. It further builds upon this understanding that time is not a fixed external reality but a malleable construct, manifest, in part, from the words and stories we tell. Ultimately, the key to unlocking the mysteries of time may lie not in some objective truth, but in the collaborative dances between human and artificial minds, as we all play our part in building the temporal realities we experience.
References
Geoff Brumfiel. Researchers say time is an illusion. So why are we all obsessed with it? NPR. December 16, 2022.
The Dual Illusions of Time
16
0
16.04.2024
Can large language models (LLMs) truly comprehend the concept of time? It's a question that goes beyond mere clock-reading abilities and strikes at the heart of how artificial intelligences (AIs) perceive and process temporal reality. But to fully understand the implications of this question, let's consider the nature of human time perception itself. Do we, as biological beings, have an accurate grasp of time, or is our understanding of it inherently limited and subjective? As it turns out, one of the most powerful tools we have for making sense of time, beyond the ticking of a clock, is language. The words we use and the narratives we construct play a crucial role in shaping our temporal experiences and allowing us to navigate the complexities of past, present, and future. This got me thinking about the potential parallels and differences between human and AI perceptions of time, and the central role that language might play in mediating these temporal realities.
It's clear to me that time is a curious or even slippery concept—one that we often take for granted as an objective reality governing our lives. We mark its passage with clocks and calendars; we organize our experiences into narratives of past, present, and future; and we speak of it as if it's a fixed and immutable force. But what if time is not quite what it seems? What if it's more of a cognitive illusion, a construct shaped, in part, by the........
© Psychology Today
visit website
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Belen Fernandez
Andrew Mitrovica
Mort Laitner
Nikkei Editorial
Ali Fathollah-Nejad
Rami G Khouri
