Let's start with a harsh reality—despite billions spent annually on employee engagement surveys, initiatives, and consultants, most companies are still struggling with disengaged workers. All the fancy assessments, town halls, and free snacks in the office don't seem to be moving the needle on engagement levels. It's time to admit we have a fundamental flaw in how we approach this critical issue.
The crux of the problem? We're relying on obsolete models and methods that simply don't align with the modern workforce and workplace. Most companies are stuck in the one-size-fits-all mentality when it comes to engagement. Generic frameworks and standardized surveys dominate the landscape, overlooking the unique dynamics and needs of different teams and departments. Further, these outdated models simply don’t align with the dynamics of the modern workforce and work environments. Traditional engagement models were designed for a different era—one with minimal remote work, rigid hierarchies, and employees who would stay at the same company for decades. This world was long but is now gone! It's time to break free from this cookie-cutter approach and embrace the power of customization.
Even our assessment tools are becoming increasingly antiquated. Most still use the same old self-report surveys that have been around for ages. In a diverse, dynamic workforce, we can't rely on simple quantitative, self-report metrics to capture the nuanced drivers of engagement. Self-report survey fatigue is also rampant, with fewer employees finding the time or motivation to thoroughly complete those marathoner assessments these days. Further, our engagement assessments provide lagging, retrospective data rather than real-time intelligence. By the time issues are detected, it's often too late to course-correct before your best talent jumps ship.
It's not just about tailoring our assessments; it's about linking engagement to core organizational outcomes. I've discussed this topic previously, but there is little empirical evidence that current engagement metrics definitively relate to strategic outcomes: business outcomes that truly matter, like financial performance and revenue growth. We're obsessing over scoring high on ambiguous factors that may have no tangible business impact. In most companies, engagement is treated as a standalone metric that’s divorced from the broader tapestry of organizational success.
Perhaps even more alarmingly, even when we collect engagement data, organizations consistently fail to convert those insights into meaningful actions that drive sustainable change. We're obsessing over scoring high on ambiguous metrics rather than treating engagement as an ongoing process directly tied to business outcomes. Without a clear understanding of how to interpret survey results and implement targeted interventions, leaders may feel overwhelmed or unsure of where to start, leading to inertia and a sense of disillusionment among employees.
Worse still, the engagement interventions we do implement are often woefully inadequate and short-sighted. Many engagement interventions focus solely on addressing surface-level indicators of engagement, such as satisfaction with work perks or company culture, without delving deeper into the underlying factors that drive motivation and commitment. As a result, organizations may implement superficial solutions that fail to address systemic issues such as poor leadership, lack of career development opportunities, or workplace inequities. We need to dig deeper and address the root causes of disengagement rather than slapping Band-Aids on surface-level symptoms.
Here's the painful truth—most of our current engagement models, assessments, and interventions are fundamentally flawed. We're wasting immense resources chasing metrics that barely correlate with the outcomes that truly matter.
If we want to finally crack this code, we need a paradigm shift in how we conceptualize and cultivate engagement in today's radically transformed workplace. That means:
In essence, we need to rebuild our engagement strategy from the foundation up using modern tools, progressive people philosophies, and an obsessive focus on generating tangible organizational value. Engaging today's workforce demands innovative thinking and a willingness to tear down the outdated paradigms holding us back. It's time to stop wasting resources on archaic approaches and face this new reality head-on. Otherwise, we're doomed to an endless cycle of disillusionment as our best employees keep walking out the door.
References
Handoyo, A. W., Devie, J., & Juniarti, A. (2019). Employee Engagement Fail to Boost the Relationship Between Learning Organization and Financial Performance. Advances in Economic, Business and Management Ressearch, 103(1), 242-256.
Iddagoda, Y. A., & Opatha, H. H. D. N. P. (2017). Identified research gaps in employee engagement. International Business Research, 10(2), 63-73.
Lund, H. M. (2019). The Relationship between Employee Engagement and Financial Performance in the Business-to-Business Market. In Knowledge Economy Society: Contemporary Organisations in the Process of Institutional Transformations (pp 305-514). Cracow University Press
Why Do Employee Engagement Initiatives Fail?
25
0
29.03.2024
Let's start with a harsh reality—despite billions spent annually on employee engagement surveys, initiatives, and consultants, most companies are still struggling with disengaged workers. All the fancy assessments, town halls, and free snacks in the office don't seem to be moving the needle on engagement levels. It's time to admit we have a fundamental flaw in how we approach this critical issue.
The crux of the problem? We're relying on obsolete models and methods that simply don't align with the modern workforce and workplace. Most companies are stuck in the one-size-fits-all mentality when it comes to engagement. Generic frameworks and standardized surveys dominate the landscape, overlooking the unique dynamics and needs of different teams and departments. Further, these outdated models simply don’t align with the dynamics of the modern workforce and work environments. Traditional engagement models were designed for a different era—one with minimal remote work, rigid hierarchies, and employees who would stay at the same company for decades. This world was long but is now gone! It's time to break free from this cookie-cutter approach and embrace the power of customization.
Even our assessment tools are becoming increasingly antiquated. Most still use the same old self-report surveys that have been around for ages.........
© Psychology Today
visit website
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Belen Fernandez
Andrew Mitrovica
Mort Laitner
Rami G Khouri
Nikkei Editorial
Ali Fathollah-Nejad
