If you've been perplexed by current findings on alcohol and health, there's a good reason. Results from recent scientific studies run the gambit from finding that modest alcohol consumption is better for your health than not drinking at all, to the World Health Organization stating that no level of alcohol is safe. How can there be such wide discrepancies in findings? To understand why, I recently attended the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine public meeting, Review of Evidence on Alcohol and Health. Presenters illustrated several issues with how these studies are conducted that have led to the current confusion.
First, let’s cover the classic pattern of alcohol and health, which is something scientists call a J- shaped curve, in which low alcohol consumption (no more than zero to two drinks a day) has a lower risk of health problems than abstaining from alcohol. Health risks increase noticeably from low consumption to moderate and from moderate to high. While those of us who enjoy modest consumption of alcohol are happy to hear about such findings, the results are counterintuitive. Why would abstainers have worse outcomes than those with modest alcohol consumption?
As explained by Dr. Tim Stockwell, former director of the Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research at the University of Victoria, lifetime abstainers start out less healthy than their drinking peers, beginning at the legal drinking age. In early adulthood, lifetime abstainers tend to have more disabilities, worse health, and less income than young adults who consume alcohol. This difference in overall health status then increases with age. He noted that, “The widening disparity in the health status of these groups leads to larger apparent health benefits from drinking alcohol for older adults.”
Additionally, when people become unwell, they reduce or abstain from drinking. If they participate in an alcohol study, these people often are classified based on their current status as abstainers rather than as former drinkers. Indeed, Dr. Stockwell described how former drinkers at all levels have higher health risks than their current drinker counterparts.
These selection biases can lead to the appearance of a health benefit from modest alcohol intake that does not exist. Dr. Stockwell and his colleagues demonstrated that longitudinal studies that exclude former and occasional drinkers from the abstainer category find that low-volume drinkers have an equivalent mortality risk as abstainers, whereas studies that do not take these biases into account find the "typical" reduced mortality risk for low volume drinkers compared to abstainers. Thus, the J-shaped curve goes away in studies that control for important selection biases.
Whereas there has been controversy regarding the results pertaining to low-volume drinkers, the results for heavier volumes of drinking are consistent: the more you drink, the greater the health risk. How great is the risk? Compared to lifetime abstainers, medium-volume drinkers (averaging two to three drinks per day) have a 5% greater risk; people who average three to four and a half drinks per day have a 19% greater risk of all-cause mortality compared to lifetime abstainers; those who average 5 or more drinks per day have a 35% greater risk for all-cause mortality.
Unfortunately for women, the increased health risks begin at a lower volume of drinking than for men. Women face a significantly greater risk for all-cause mortality starting at an average of two to three drinks per day, whereas for men, a similar level of risk appears when averaging three to four and a half drinks per day. When I asked Dr. Stockwell if this disparity is simply due to typical sex differences in body size, he said that it’s difficult to tell. For one thing, men and women tend to have different drinking patterns. Importantly, he noted few good alcohol and health studies focus on women.
What do these findings mean for everyday people? According to Dr. Stockwell, “It’s important to be skeptical of claims that modest alcohol consumption is good for health. Regardless of the type of alcoholic beverage, they all contain ethanol, which has toxic, addictive, and carcinogenic effects.” In other words, if you currently imbibe two or more drinks a day, you may want to consider alcohol as an occasional treat rather than a part of your daily routine.
References
de Gaetano, G, Costanzo, S. (2017). Alcohol and Health: Praise of the J Curves∗. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 70 (8) 923 925.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.710
Stockwell T, Zhao J, Clay J, Levesque C, Sanger N, Sherk A, Naimi T. (2024). Why do only some cohort studies find health benefits from low volume alcohol use? A systematic review and meta-analysis of study characteristics that may bias mortality risk estimates. Journal of the Study of Alcohol and Drugs. doi: 10.15288/jsad.23-00283.
World Health Organization (January 4, 2023). No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health.
Zhao J, Stockwell T, Naimi T, Churchill S, Clay J, & Sherk A. (2023). Association Between Daily Alcohol Intake and Risk of All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. JAMA Network Open. 6(3):e236185. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6185
Why Findings on Alcohol and Health Are So Confusing
33
0
12.04.2024
If you've been perplexed by current findings on alcohol and health, there's a good reason. Results from recent scientific studies run the gambit from finding that modest alcohol consumption is better for your health than not drinking at all, to the World Health Organization stating that no level of alcohol is safe. How can there be such wide discrepancies in findings? To understand why, I recently attended the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine public meeting, Review of Evidence on Alcohol and Health. Presenters illustrated several issues with how these studies are conducted that have led to the current confusion.
First, let’s cover the classic pattern of alcohol and health, which is something scientists call a J- shaped curve, in which low alcohol consumption (no more than zero to two drinks a day) has a lower risk of health problems than abstaining from alcohol. Health risks increase noticeably from low consumption to moderate and from moderate to high. While those of us who enjoy modest consumption of alcohol are happy to hear about such findings, the results are counterintuitive. Why would abstainers have worse outcomes than those with modest alcohol consumption?
As explained by Dr. Tim Stockwell, former director of the Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research at the........
© Psychology Today
visit website
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Belen Fernandez
Rami G Khouri
Mort Laitner
Rachel Marsden
Donald Low
Bradley Blankenship
Ali Fathollah-Nejad
Nikkei Editorial
Abbas Juma
Michael Kwet
