Tweet Share Share Comment

Sen. Chuck Schumer’s call for new elections in Israel marks a startling turn in the spiraling tensions between Washington and Jerusalem.

In a speech delivered Thursday on the Senate floor, Schumer declared that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s extremism, especially in his refusal to tone down the bombing of Gaza in the war with Hamas, is turning the Jewish state into a “pariah” nation. The speech set off political earthquakes in both capitals—the Israeli newspaper Haaretz called it a “watershed moment” in relations between the two countries—noting that Schumer is not only the Senate majority leader but also a longtime stalwart supporter of Israel and “the highest-ranking Jewish elected official in U.S. history.”

Schumer’s call was not quite as firm as some headlines suggest. He did not advocate an immediate cease-fire in Israel’s war with Hamas. Rather, he said a new election—to “give Israelis an opportunity to express their vision for the postwar future”—should be held “once the war starts to wind down.” He put forth no plan or timetable on when the winding down should take place.

In another little-noted passage, he also called for the ouster of Mahmoud Abbas as president of the Palestinian Authority, saying that “for there to be any hope of peace in the future, Abbas must step down and be replaced by a new generation of Palestinian leaders who will work towards attaining peace with a Jewish state.”

Still, Schumer’s critique was as stark and stern as any delivered by an American political leader. Netanyahu, he lamented, “has lost his way, putting himself in coalition with far-right extremists” that “no longer fits the needs of Israel after Oct. 7.” The world has changed “radically” since then. Netanyahu’s toleration of civilian deaths in Gaza is “pushing support for Israel worldwide to historic lows,” and Israel, he noted, “cannot survive if it becomes a pariah.”

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

He went further still, warning that the patience of even the United States, Israel’s strongest ally, has limits. The Netanyahu coalition, he charged, is “pursuing dangerous and inflammatory policies that test existing U.S. standards for assistance.” If the coalition remains in power, Washington should use its “leverage” to “play a more active role in shaping Israeli policy.”

Earlier this week, eight Senate Democrats called on President Biden to halt military aid to Israel if it doesn’t do more to minimize civilian casualties in Gaza. But Schumer has never supported placing any such limits on aid to Israel. Quite the contrary. He has rarely criticized Israel at all. He even joined many Republicans in speaking out against President Barack Obama’s Iran nuclear deal because Netanyahu argued that the accord would harm Israeli security.

Advertisement

It is unclear what impact Schumer’s speech will have. Republicans in Congress have denounced it as “grotesque” and “inappropriate.” White House national security spokesman John Kirby said that Schumer gave advance notice of the speech to Biden, who neither approved nor disapproved it. Whether or not to hold elections, Kirby said, “is up to the Israelis.”

In Israel, the speech has been the subject of headline news all day. Haaretz predicted that it “will only further cement Netanyahu’s poor standing within the Democratic Party.” Opposition leader Yair Lapid lauded Schumer’s turn as “proof that one by one” the prime minister “is losing Israel’s biggest supporters in the U.S.”

Advertisement

However, most opinion has been critical. Benny Gantz, a member of Netanyahu’s emergency war Cabinet but also his most prominent rival if there were elections, called Schumer’s speech “a mistake.” He praised the senator as a “friend who helps us a lot, including recently,” but added, “Israel is a strong democracy, and only its citizens will determine its leadership and future. Any external intervention in the matter is incorrect and unacceptable.”

Advertisement

Advertisement

Thousands of Israelis have protested in the streets for Netanyahu to leave office or for new elections to be held. But it is unclear just how this would happen, since new elections aren’t scheduled until Oct. 2026. The only way for Netanyahu to be ousted before then would be if a handful of Netanyahu’s coalition partners resigned, eliminating his majority in Parliament. All of his partners stand to his right politically, so they would resign only if Netanyahu moved too far for their taste to the left—that is, too far toward accommodation with the Palestinians or his Western critics.

Related From Slate

Fred Kaplan

Four Things That Will Have to Happen for the Israel-Hamas War to End

Read More

Popular in News & Politics

  1. It’s Not Biden’s Memory Issues That Stand Out in His Special Counsel Interview
  2. Here’s the Real Person to Blame for that GOP Prosecutor Who Shivved Biden
  3. In a MAGA vs. MAGA House Primary, Matt Gaetz Is Out for Revenge
  4. Wait, So … Is George Santos Really Running for Congress Again?

This is one reason Netanyahu refuses to cave—refuses even to dissociate himself from his partners’ most extreme positions. Schumer singled out two of the most outspoken partners, Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, who have advocated reoccupying Gaza and annexing the West Bank. Ben-Gvir also recently praised a Jewish settler for murdering a 12-year-old Palestinian boy. Nor, for similar political reasons, has Netanyahu deigned to pay even lip service to the notion of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, even after Saudi leaders said they would resume talks toward “normalized” relations with Israel if he merely endorsed the idea of a Palestinian state as a goal, in principle, at some time in the future.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Complicating all this is the fact that Hamas—not Israel—has rejected a plan for a six-week cease-fire, during which Hamas would free 40 hostages (out of the 134 remaining in Gaza) and Israel would release 400 Palestinian prisoners. Israel not only supports the plan but helped negotiate it with the U.S., Egypt, and Qatar.

Netanyahu’s political position is so fraught and tangled with the extreme right that he can’t even tout himself publicly as a willing peacemaker, stressing instead his determination to continue the war, pushing Israeli troops to the southern edge of Gaza, until Hamas is completely destroyed.

Schumer may have hoped to pressure Netanyahu and other Israelis to support moves toward peace more loudly. Egypt and Qatar have been pressing Hamas to do the same—but, it seems, not hard enough.

Tweet Share Share Comment

QOSHE - Why Chuck Schumer’s Break With Netanyahu Seems Like a Turning Point - Fred Kaplan
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

Why Chuck Schumer’s Break With Netanyahu Seems Like a Turning Point

6 20
15.03.2024
Tweet Share Share Comment

Sen. Chuck Schumer’s call for new elections in Israel marks a startling turn in the spiraling tensions between Washington and Jerusalem.

In a speech delivered Thursday on the Senate floor, Schumer declared that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s extremism, especially in his refusal to tone down the bombing of Gaza in the war with Hamas, is turning the Jewish state into a “pariah” nation. The speech set off political earthquakes in both capitals—the Israeli newspaper Haaretz called it a “watershed moment” in relations between the two countries—noting that Schumer is not only the Senate majority leader but also a longtime stalwart supporter of Israel and “the highest-ranking Jewish elected official in U.S. history.”

Schumer’s call was not quite as firm as some headlines suggest. He did not advocate an immediate cease-fire in Israel’s war with Hamas. Rather, he said a new election—to “give Israelis an opportunity to express their vision for the postwar future”—should be held “once the war starts to wind down.” He put forth no plan or timetable on when the winding down should take place.

In another little-noted passage, he also called for the ouster of Mahmoud Abbas as president of the Palestinian Authority, saying that “for there to be any hope of peace in the future, Abbas must step down and be replaced by a new generation of Palestinian leaders who will work towards attaining peace with a Jewish state.”

Still, Schumer’s critique was as stark and stern as any delivered by an American political leader. Netanyahu, he lamented, “has lost his way, putting himself in coalition with far-right extremists” that “no longer fits the needs of Israel after Oct. 7.” The world has changed........

© Slate


Get it on Google Play