For decades, the tiny symbol has been the plumbing of global capitalism. It might finally be replaced.

To marvel at the choice and convenience of modern shopping, go visit your grocery-store mustard aisle. My local Whole Foods sells more than 20 different kinds: basic yellow mustard and Grey Poupon, yes, but also “spicy brown mustard” and “banana-pepper mustard” and “no-sugar-added honey mustard” and “organic salt-free mustard.” There is “uniquely sharp mustard”(!), and “sulfite-free original Dijon mustard squeeze”(!?).

Such dizzying choices are made possible by an amazing piece of technology: the barcode. These black-and-white lines are machine-speak for an item’s Universal Product Code, which allows a scanner to tell you exactly what the item is, and draw up its price in any given store. The barcode is why a cashier can quickly scan your stuff, shove it into a bag, and hand you a receipt (and how self-checkout kiosks are able to make you do all the work). And because the barcode allows for incredible efficiency in tracking and managing inventory, it is a large part of why grocery stores now have a paralyzing number of options. Around the time the barcode debuted, in 1974, supermarkets stocked an average of 9,000 products. Today, you will find more than 30,000.

In this half century, the barcode has become the plumbing of global capitalism—revolutionary, pervasive, forgettable. More kinds of scannable codes have arrived since the ’70s, but the linear UPC barcode is on the packaging of most consumer products you get from every store, grocery or otherwise, brick-and-mortar or online. It is among the greatest, most consequential inventions in American history. How did we get stadium-size supermarkets, Costcos, and Amazon? “The barcode has to be there at the beginning,” Timothy Simcoe, an economist at Boston University who has studied the technology, told me. Barcodes are on books, TVs, wine bottles, spatulas, and underwear. There are barcode tattoos, barcode conspiracy theories, barcode presidential scandals, and buildings on four continents designed to resemble barcodes.

Basically nothing about the symbol itself has changed in 50 years. Look at the first barcode, from a 67-cent pack of Wrigley’s gum: It doesn’t seem outdated, because it isn’t outdated. Scanners have gotten cheaper and better, but the barcode is still the barcode is still the barcode. At least, it is for now. After all this time, the barcode’s success in building an America that crams its stores and warehouses with an ever-expanding pile of stuff might finally be its own undoing.

If the sound of the barcode era is beep, the sound of the era that preceded it was click. Every product once needed a literal sticker price, which was stamped into place. “In those days, we were kind of like Western gunmen,” Norman Mayne, the CEO of Ohio’s Dorothy Lane Market since 1967, told me. “We had our price stamper on our hip as if that was our six-shooter.” Without a code to scan, a hardware store would have to manually log every single wrench, paint can, and tape measure coming and leaving through its doors. A bookstore might not have an up-to-date sense of which titles were selling and which weren’t. Grocery stores had it especially rough; the checkout counter often turned into a traffic jam. A cashier adept at swiftly keying in prices was so valued that, in 1964, the winner of the International Checker of the Year Award was given a trip to Hawaii and a mink stole.

In the early 1970s, grocery execs came together to figure out a better way. First, they conceived of a standard 12-digit Universal Product Code tied to every product, sort of like a phone number that would ring up not a person, but cans of Campbell’s chicken-noodle soup. Then they picked a slate of companies to figure out some way for machines to read it. The barcode had to be virtually fail-proof, to avoid a scanner reading one product as another. It had to be simple, so that even a cashier in training could quickly run it over a scanner at any angle. It had to be tiny, to fit on even the smallest items. It had to be easily and cheaply printable, so barcoding every item wouldn’t cost a fortune.

It was October 20, 1949 and IBM inventor N. Joseph Woodland applied for the first patent on bar code technology.

It was not until 1973 the grocery industry’s task force settled on a standard of IBM’s approach for the UPC Code.

RCA and Litton was under close consideration. pic.twitter.com/NEjEU6UGtD

If talks had gone just a bit differently, we might have ended up in a world with a “sun” barcode on every deodorant stick and cereal box, or maybe RCA’s round one, which had already been piloted at a Kroger in Kenwood, Ohio. “We came extremely close to ending up with the RCA ‘bullseye’ barcode,” Jordan Frith, a Clemson professor and the author of Barcode, told me. “It came down to the last day.” In 1973, the committee went out to an adult theater to watch Deep Throat (I’m serious), and soon made their decision: IBM’s rectangular, zebra-striped barcode. One symbol to rule them all.

The barcode is deceptively simple by design. The black-and-white stripes of varying thickness represent the numbers in a UPC code. Point a laser at the barcode, and light will reflect back from the white lines, but not the black ones, turning into 0s and 1s on a computer. In that split-second beep, a machine knows that the first chunk of those 12 digits is the manufacturer’s code, whereas the second half points to the specific product—sulfite-free dijon, not the plain dijon or the dijon laced with Mike’s Hot Honey. From the beginning, the design was basically perfect. “We got very, very few errors,” Paul McEnroe, an engineer on the IBM barcode team and the author of The Barcode (which is a different book from Barcode), told me. At the company’s barcode lab in North Carolina, an IBM vice president picked up a pack of cigarettes with a barcode, McEnroe said, “and threw it across the checkout stand. It bounced as it passed across the top of the table, over the scanner window, spinning. And the damn thing—it read it.”

The UPC barcode was only ever supposed to be confined to the grocery industry, and it nearly didn’t make it to that. Fears that the symbol’s spread would automate workers out of their jobs led unions to wage a decades-long war against it. Even some of the people who developed the barcode predicted that fewer than 10,000 companies would ever use it. Over time, convenience won out. Now more than 10,000 UPC barcodes are scanned every second. “Think of the barcode as the Rosetta stone of the 20th century,” Mark Cohen, a retailing professor at Columbia Business School, told me. “Thousands of years from now, some archeologist is going to uncover the barcode, and it will be revealed to be the first step in digitizing information.”

It set off a Cambrian explosion in the products on America’s shelves, abetting the creation of megastores and ultrafast supply chains. The wonders of modern shopping are downstream from the barcode, and so are its worst excesses: mindless consumerism, wasteful junk, corporate dominance. Bigger companies were quicker to pay up for expensive scanners, which allowed them to move even more efficiently and wring out profits that mom-and-pop stores couldn’t.

The barcode also unleashed many more kinds of barcodes, including siblings of the original with more lines representing more numbers and letters, and distant cousins that look nothing like it. Different industries have their own symbols, and sometimes so do different companies. The U.S. Postal Service, FedEx, and UPS all use different symbols to track a product's journey to your doorstep. One barcode descendant in particular has risen to prominence in recent years: the QR code. That is where the trouble starts.

Though at first something of a dud, QR codes have come to adorn restaurant menus, installation guides, TV ads, and so many other things. The square black-and-white patches act as physical links to the internet; point your smartphone at one, and it will pull up a webpage. But depending on how they’re set up, the codes are also capable of functioning in the same way as the original barcode: storing information about products and scanning with a beep at the register. The difference is that QR codes can store much, much more information. A traditional barcode conjures an item and its price. A QR code, when used as a barcode, can additionally identify an item’s expiration date, when and where it was made, and many more little bits of data.

The powers of a QR code are appealing to pretty much any brand that makes consumer products, and any store that sells them. If just two jugs of milk on the dairy shelf are days away from expiring, a store could use QR codes to automatically slash their price and get them out the door. A listeria outbreak might be easier to corral by pinpointing the specific ice-cream pints that are affected. A drug store can immediately know whether tubes of whitening toothpaste on a special display near the entrance outsell the same tubes on a shelf in the back.

Then consider us shoppers. Pointing your phone at a QR code could “unlock an experience the manufacturer wants to take you on,” Carrie Wilkie, the senior vice president of standards and technology at GS1 US, a not-for-profit that is sort of like the government of barcodes, told me. Download your grocery store’s app and type in that you have a peanut allergy, and you could get a pop-up if something you scan has even trace amounts of peanuts. Perhaps you might scan a pair of selvadge jeans and decide they’re not worth $200, then later receive an email giving you 15 percent. Loyalty points, coupons, clothing tags, warranty forms, back-of-the-box recipes, nutrition facts, and even interactive games—all of that is getting stuffed into the QR code.

The original barcode, for all its persistence, is finally falling behind in the world it helped create. “We’ve gotten a little bit comfortable with what the linear barcode can do for us without challenging what it can’t do,” Wilkie said. Anyone can make a QR code with just a few clicks, but only GS1 produces and oversees all QR codes that also work as barcodes. The design has such an advantage that, by the end of 2027, GS1 aims to allow companies to entirely replace the old zebra-striped barcode with a QR code on products. The barcode won’t formally be phased out, but it seems destined to disappear from price tags and packages as QR codes take over. After half a century, the reign of the barcode as we’ve known it will be over.

If the old barcode created modern shopping in all of its variety and excess, the new one is ushering in the next era—with its own pitfalls of data harvesting and hyper-targeting. Retailers “are very excited about the data that can be gleaned from having a more advanced barcode,” Phil Lempert, a retail-industry analyst, told me. A company such as Kroger can already see what items you buy on its website and share the data to generate ads on your Roku; with a QR code, items you scan in-store with your phone can conceivably be grist for targeted ads.

At the moment, much of the potential of the QR code is still mostly that—potential. Yes, the codes are already on some packaging, but almost none is a full-fledged barcode. In September, I dropped into the Manhattan-based flagship store of Puma, the first brand in America that has transitioned to QR codes for everything. (Per the present GS1 requirements, all Puma’s products still come with a traditional barcode as well, even if it isn’t scanned.) On the second floor, past the wall of basketball shoes, I found a $40 men’s T-shirt covered with Smurfs that had a price tag with both the UPC barcode and a QR code that read SCAN ME in the middle. When I pointed my phone at the QR code, and clicked a pop-up confirming that I was in the store, my phone loaded the page for the Smurfs shirt on Puma’s website. That was it. Perhaps if I’d wanted sneakers in a size that wasn’t in stock, I could have saved a few seconds, but really nothing about shopping in the store felt like the future.

It’s likely only a matter of time. Melissa Garbayo, a Puma spokesperson, told me that QR codes are already enabling a new degree of inventory management on the company’s back end, connecting to chips that can track the precise location of every item in the store. A few other brands have started to flirt with using QR codes as barcodes, but the new codes still mostly act as basic links. Scan a can of Pepsi’s Starry lemon-lime soda (though not other Pepsi products), and you’ll open up a webpage with nutrition and allergen information. It will probably be another year or more until many retailers truly embrace the QR code, Wilkie told me. The biggest brands are positioned to get there first, just like the original barcode’s earliest adopters. Several more companies are test-running the new barcode right now, she said, hammering out what the QR codes can actually do before we all start scanning them en masse.

When the barcode officially turns 50 this summer, it won’t get a national holiday in its honor or a grand parade down Fifth Avenue with floats in the shape of laser scanners. There is no statue of IBM’s barcode czar, George Laurer; no Halloween costume for Joseph Woodland and Bernard Silver, who patented the first barcode; no foundation named after Alan Haberman, who brought together the committee of grocery execs. Perhaps the humble barcode and its creators deserve such an honor. During the design process, IBM and every other company that vyed for America’s symbol supremacy agreed to forgo profit and put the winning symbol in the public domain, part of “the greatest-ever example of industry cooperation with no government oversight,” Frith said.

Unlike its predecessor, the QR code is unlikely to ever reach the Mount Rushmore of inventions. It might not last 50 years, or even 10. New kinds of technology are far more advanced than the QR code. In 11 Amazon fulfillment centers, a spokesperson told me, a kind of artificial intelligence called “multimodal identification” can already “scan” items based on the shape and text on their packaging, no barcode needed. Still, the old barcode has one thing that the QR code, and Silicon Valley, cannot beat. It is so universally simple, and simply universal, that it may refuse to fully die. Two years after the first barcode scan, Businessweek was ready to call it a flop; when QR codes were invented in the ’90s, Frith told me, people predicted they would soon kill the barcode.

Even in the QR-code future, the barcode might still linger on certain items, both old and new—in the 2030s, ’40s, and probably for the rest of your life. A barcode that becomes a bit more invisible in daily life might be one that is also more visible when it actually appears on a product. Maybe then the barcode will finally get its due.

​When you buy a book using a link on this page, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic.

QOSHE - The Last Days of the Barcode - Saahil Desai
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

The Last Days of the Barcode

5 0
11.01.2024

For decades, the tiny symbol has been the plumbing of global capitalism. It might finally be replaced.

To marvel at the choice and convenience of modern shopping, go visit your grocery-store mustard aisle. My local Whole Foods sells more than 20 different kinds: basic yellow mustard and Grey Poupon, yes, but also “spicy brown mustard” and “banana-pepper mustard” and “no-sugar-added honey mustard” and “organic salt-free mustard.” There is “uniquely sharp mustard”(!), and “sulfite-free original Dijon mustard squeeze”(!?).

Such dizzying choices are made possible by an amazing piece of technology: the barcode. These black-and-white lines are machine-speak for an item’s Universal Product Code, which allows a scanner to tell you exactly what the item is, and draw up its price in any given store. The barcode is why a cashier can quickly scan your stuff, shove it into a bag, and hand you a receipt (and how self-checkout kiosks are able to make you do all the work). And because the barcode allows for incredible efficiency in tracking and managing inventory, it is a large part of why grocery stores now have a paralyzing number of options. Around the time the barcode debuted, in 1974, supermarkets stocked an average of 9,000 products. Today, you will find more than 30,000.

In this half century, the barcode has become the plumbing of global capitalism—revolutionary, pervasive, forgettable. More kinds of scannable codes have arrived since the ’70s, but the linear UPC barcode is on the packaging of most consumer products you get from every store, grocery or otherwise, brick-and-mortar or online. It is among the greatest, most consequential inventions in American history. How did we get stadium-size supermarkets, Costcos, and Amazon? “The barcode has to be there at the beginning,” Timothy Simcoe, an economist at Boston University who has studied the technology, told me. Barcodes are on books, TVs, wine bottles, spatulas, and underwear. There are barcode tattoos, barcode conspiracy theories, barcode presidential scandals, and buildings on four continents designed to resemble barcodes.

Basically nothing about the symbol itself has changed in 50 years. Look at the first barcode, from a 67-cent pack of Wrigley’s gum: It doesn’t seem outdated, because it isn’t outdated. Scanners have gotten cheaper and better, but the barcode is still the barcode is still the barcode. At least, it is for now. After all this time, the barcode’s success in building an America that crams its stores and warehouses with an ever-expanding pile of stuff might finally be its own undoing.

If the sound of the barcode era is beep, the sound of the era that preceded it was click. Every product once needed a literal sticker price, which was stamped into place. “In those days, we were kind of like Western gunmen,” Norman Mayne, the CEO of Ohio’s Dorothy Lane Market since 1967, told me. “We had our price stamper on our hip as if that was our six-shooter.” Without a code to scan, a hardware store would have to manually log every single wrench, paint can, and tape measure coming and leaving through its doors. A bookstore might not have an up-to-date sense of which titles were selling and which weren’t. Grocery stores had it especially rough; the checkout counter often turned into a traffic jam. A cashier adept at swiftly keying in prices was so valued that, in 1964, the winner of the International Checker of the Year Award was given a trip to Hawaii and a mink stole.

In the early 1970s, grocery execs came together to figure out a better way. First, they conceived of a standard 12-digit Universal Product Code tied to every product, sort of like a phone number that would ring........

© The Atlantic


Get it on Google Play