Peter Dutton began the new year by trying very hard to make sure there was nothing new about it. Summer as circuit-breaker for Labor? Not so fast. It’s “almost like this year has started off like last year finished for Anthony Albanese”, he told 2GB.

A few days later, on 4BC, Dutton told listeners, “I just don’t think he’s got his mojo back, and we’re seeing the Anthony Albanese from last year roll into this year”.

Illustration by Jim Pavlidis.Credit:

“Mojo” was an interesting word to use. The term became particularly popular among journalists towards the end of last year. Its meaning is a little vague, but I think it’s fair to say leans more towards the performative than the substantive: some combination of confidence, strategic nous and luck.

Some argue that a focus on such things skews media coverage away from actual policy. That’s true, but it is also foolish to ignore their role in what is a conflict-driven arena. In War and Peace, Tolstoy has one of his characters declare that “a battle is won by the side that has firmly resolved to win”. In the battle of Austerlitz, says Prince Andrei, “We said to ourselves that we were losing the battle, and we did lose it. And we said so because we had nothing to fight for then: we wanted to get away from the battlefield as soon as we could.”

Dutton’s declaration was one of those rare honest moments for politicians, when they acknowledge that leaders’ fortunes are often determined by intangible factors – things like psychology, luck and the ability to entertain (what Laurie Oakes called “razzle-dazzle”). And it was honest in another way, an oblique concession that any difficulties Albanese might now be experiencing were not so much permanent character flaws as cyclical. After all, he had had his mojo before; presumably he could have it again.

New year, new battlelines: Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.Credit: Joe Armao

This is Dutton’s fear and Albanese’s desire. Much has already been made of the political contrast between last summer and this summer: then Labor was soaring, now it’s only going so-so. Interestingly, though, Albanese’s approach last January was similar to his approach now. In the equivalent week last year, across various locations, he spoke to journalists 10 times; this year it was also 10. Last year he was talking about something he wanted done – the Indigenous Voice to parliament – though he was fuzzy about the details. This year he is talking about action on grocery prices, and the details are just as fuzzy.

There is one important difference. As became depressingly clear last October, the Voice was simply not that important to most people. This year, Albanese’s topic is something every Australian is talking about.

Which is not to say the government’s plans add up to much – as Rod Sims, former ACCC head, wrote last week. The announcement felt more like something suited to opposition: performing concern rather than genuinely doing something. In opposition, policies are not so much solutions as ways to shine a spotlight on a problem. Which is more or less what the Labor opposition under Kevin Rudd did when it raised the issue in 2007.

QOSHE - Dutton wants 2024 to be a repeat of 2023, but wishing doesn’t make it so - Sean Kelly
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

Dutton wants 2024 to be a repeat of 2023, but wishing doesn’t make it so

11 0
14.01.2024

Peter Dutton began the new year by trying very hard to make sure there was nothing new about it. Summer as circuit-breaker for Labor? Not so fast. It’s “almost like this year has started off like last year finished for Anthony Albanese”, he told 2GB.

A few days later, on 4BC, Dutton told listeners, “I just don’t think he’s got his mojo back, and we’re seeing the Anthony Albanese from last year roll into this year”.

Illustration by Jim Pavlidis.Credit:

“Mojo” was an interesting word to use. The term became particularly popular among journalists towards the end of last year. Its meaning is a little vague, but I think it’s fair to say leans more towards the performative than the substantive: some combination of confidence, strategic nous and luck.

Some argue that a........

© The Sydney Morning Herald


Get it on Google Play