It’s sometimes necessary to remind ourselves of the past in order to understand the present.
Four years ago, in 2020, evangelical Muslim organisation Tablighi Jamaat held a meeting in Delhi from March 10 to 13. This was scheduled long before the onset of Covid-19 and at a time when the Narendra Modi government was itself dismissive of the threat of a pandemic.
A March 13, 2020 PTI report had claimed: “Covid-19 is not health emergency, no need to panic”.
The Tablighi meeting was held before India issued guidelines on public gatherings. But as cases in India began to rise towards the end of March, the government determined it would scapegoat Muslims and enlisted the media to do this.
The Union government made much of evacuating the area where the congregation was being held. The PM sent National Security Advisor Ajit Doval to “reason” with the organisers, who had been asking for safe evacuation for days. The virus’ novelty and the first deaths coincided with the Tablighi Jamaat gathering and open season was declared on it.
“The main reason for increased number of cases is that members of the Tablighi Jamaat have travelled across the country,” said Lav Agarwal, health ministry joint secretary. On April 1, BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya tweeted that the Tablighi gathering was like an “Islamic insurrection”. On April 4, MNS chief Raj Thackeray suggested the group’s members be shot. In Uttar Pradesh, the group’s members were jailed and booked under the anti-terror National Security Act.
On April 5, Lav Agarwal said: ‘The doubling rate in India is 4.1 days, had the congregation at Nizamuddin not happened and additional cases not come, this would have been about 7.14 days.” As later events proved, this was nonsense, but it was par for the course for this government.
On April 18, Agarwal made another claim, that the group was the dominant single cause of the pandemic. Thus, the poisonous lie was spread and its effect began to take place in the citizenry as fast as the COVID-19 itself. A Hindi daily reported that Tablighi Jamaat members quarantined in a facility in western Uttar Pradesh’s Saharanpur had “demanded” non-vegetarian food and were defecating in the open inside the hospital. The Saharanpur police tweeted no such thing had happened and the story was taken down.
Also Read: COVID, Communal Reporting and Centre’s Attempt to Use Independent Media as Alibi for Inaction
During the months of active persecution, the group’s members, including foreigners, were jailed, charged with attempted murder and provisions of Section 269 (“whoever wilfully or negligently does any act which is likely to spread the infection of any disease dangerous to life”) were invoked.
The theories being promoted were that they were deliberately spreading the virus around India by getting themselves infected, spitting on fruit, refusing to wear masks, running around naked in their wards, harassing nurses, and so on.
None of this was true.
The world noticed India’s malice against Muslims and it was reported:
“It was already dangerous to be Muslim in India. Then came the coronavirus” (TIME);
“Coronavirus: Islamophobia concerns after India mosque outbreak” (BBC);
“In India, coronavirus fans religious hatred” (The New York Times).
Without being convicted and even without any evidence, Jamaat members were “blacklisted” from receiving visas in the future.
Also read: The Tablighi Jamaat Case and How India Topped a Global Index of Religious Bias During COVID
In June, the Modi government amended the policy for visa applications to India to introduce a Tabligh-specific clause:
“Restriction on engaging in Tabligh activities — foreign nationals granted any type of visa and OCI cardholders shall not be permitted to engage themselves in Tabligh work. There will be no restriction in visiting religious places and attending normal religious activities like attending religious discourses. However, preaching religious ideologies, making speeches in religious places, distribution of audio or visual display/pamphlets pertaining to religious ideologies, spreading conversion, etc will not be allowed.”
This was the first time in India that a particular religious group had been mentioned in the list of visa guidelines. This was purely to fuel the fire that was already raging in the media, blaming the group for the deliberate spread of COVID-19 in India and absolving the government from its responsibility, especially for the fallout of the disastrous and unplanned 2020 lockdown.
It was only after it became generally accepted that the virus was an unstoppable global phenomenon which had spread through multiple ways that the “Tablighi conspiracy” story faded. On May 19, the foreign members of the Jamaat moved court to be released from institutional quarantine, where they had been held for over a month and a half, despite repeatedly testing negative for COVID-19. The government told the court that none of the visitors had been “detained”, they were merely “asked to join the investigation”. But the passports of over 700 Jamaat members had been seized, and they were not in fact, free.
Also Read: Tamil Nadu Has Created a Detention Camp Just to Hold 129 Foreign Tablighi Jamaat Members
On July 6, before the chief metropolitan magistrate at Delhi’s Saket court, 44 Tablighi Jamaat members refused to pay fines of between Rs 4,000 to Rs 10,000 in exchange for closing of cases and bravely chose to face trial. By December, eight months after 11 states had filed 20 FIRs against more than 2,500 Tablighi Jamaat members, nobody was convicted. And the courts fiercely criticised the government’s actions.
Judges called the cases “malicious”, “a virtual persecution”, “abuse of process”, “abuse of power”, and said the Tablighi Jamaat members were “scapegoats of a political government” who had acted against the group though having “not an iota of evidence”.
That such a vicious falsehood was allowed to be spread deliberately should tell us much of what we need to understand about where we are today.
Aakar Patel is a senior journalist and columnist.
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Belen Fernandez
Andrew Mitrovica
Mort Laitner
Ali Fathollah-Nejad
Rami G Khouri
Nikkei Editorial
visit website
