Now that the Alabama Supreme Court has decided frozen embryos are children under state law, the state can start treating them the way it treats non-embryonic children and adults: terribly.
In a ruling last week, the court said embryos used for in vitro fertilization are people. That means a person could be held liable for destroying them, putting IVF clinics throughout the state in an immediate bind and the future of IVF services in jeopardy.
In a concurring opinion, Chief Justice Tom Parker wrote: “In summary, the theologically based view of the sanctity of life adopted by the People of Alabama encompasses the following: (1) God made every person in His image; (2) each person therefore has a value that far exceeds the ability of human beings to calculate; and (3) human life cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God, who views the destruction of His image as an affront to Himself.”
OK. Let’s take that troublingly theocratic language and apply it the humans in Alabama who are not presently kept in a freezer.
If each person "has a value that far exceeds the ability of human beings to calculate," then please explain why a 2022 Census data analysis by 24/7 Wall Street ranked Alabama the fifth-worst state for children living in poverty, with a child-poverty rate of 22.7%.
The analysis also found Alabama has the sixth-highest percentage of children receiving food stamps benefits, at 6.6%.
That doesn’t sound like human life is being properly valued. Not at all.
What about my embryo?An embryo that could be my second child is in Alabama. A court just put that in jeopardy.
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in 2021, Alabama had a 7.56% infant mortality rate, the third worst state in America.
According to the Alabama Public Health, Black women in the state “have double the infant mortality rate than white women, highlighting racial and ethnic disparities present for expecting mothers to overcome.”
A Georgetown University study found that in Alabama, about 1 in 6 women of reproductive age (18-44) doesn't have health insurance: "This was the fifth-highest uninsured rate in the country in 2021.”
Yet Alabama has not taken advantage of the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion – an odd way to preserve lives that are of incalculable value.
Alabama's chief justice argued in the ruling, one that may now be mirrored in other states, that “God made every person in His image.” So why are Alabama lawmakers advancing legislation that would define men and women by their reproductive anatomy and strip rights away from transgender people?
Wouldn’t a transgender person, like a frozen embryo, be made in God’s image and thus entitled to every right of personhood?
Good luck to families:So you thought Republicans were going to help families in an election year? Nope.
Why has Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey taken it upon herself, by signing two bills, to declare that transgender athletes cannot compete in K-12 or college sports that align with their gender identity.
If the transgender athletes have “value that far exceeds the ability of human beings to calculate,” shouldn’t they be entitled to all the rights afforded cisgender people or, for that matter, frozen embryos?
Chief Justice Parker wrote in defense of the embryos that “human life cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God, who views the destruction of His image as an affront to Himself.”
Last month, Alabama executed convicted killer Kenneth Smith using nitrogen gas to asphyxiate him.
A USA TODAY report on the execution said: “The execution took about 22 minutes. Smith appeared to convulse and shake vigorously for about four minutes after the nitrogen gas apparently began flowing through his mask. It was another two to three minutes before he appeared to lose consciousness, all while gasping for air to the extent that the gurney shook several times.”
Was that not “the destruction of His image”? Is that not an affront to one who believes humans have value that “far exceeds the ability of human beings to calculate”?
Alabama’s attorney general on Wednesday asked the state Supreme Court to set an execution date for another death row inmate, again using nitrogen gas.
I’m neither a legal expert nor a religious one. But based on the way Alabama’s high court and the state in general handle life, I’d recommend those embryos now deemed people stay put in the freezer. It’s a lot safer in there.
About the minute you start breathing in Alabama, they stop caring about you.
Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on X, formerly Twitter, @RexHuppke and Facebook facebook.com/RexIsAJerk
Alabama now treats frozen embryos better than many of its citizens
18
4
23.02.2024
Now that the Alabama Supreme Court has decided frozen embryos are children under state law, the state can start treating them the way it treats non-embryonic children and adults: terribly.
In a ruling last week, the court said embryos used for in vitro fertilization are people. That means a person could be held liable for destroying them, putting IVF clinics throughout the state in an immediate bind and the future of IVF services in jeopardy.
In a concurring opinion, Chief Justice Tom Parker wrote: “In summary, the theologically based view of the sanctity of life adopted by the People of Alabama encompasses the following: (1) God made every person in His image; (2) each person therefore has a value that far exceeds the ability of human beings to calculate; and (3) human life cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God, who views the destruction of His image as an affront to Himself.”
OK. Let’s take that troublingly theocratic language and apply it the humans in Alabama who are not presently kept in a freezer.
If each person "has a value that far exceeds the ability of human beings to calculate," then please explain why a 2022 Census data analysis by 24/7 Wall........
© USA TODAY
visit website
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Belen Fernandez
Rami G Khouri
Mort Laitner
Donald Low
Ali Fathollah-Nejad
Nikkei Editorial
