At such a fraught time, Poilievre should appeal to Canadians’ better natures, not further drive them into suspicion and division.

In politics, it is never too early or too late for a winning team to blow its lead. Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre appears to have decided that now is the time to risk squandering his political good fortune.

In the hours after an explosion killed two people at the Rainbow Bridge this week, some early reportage relied heavily on unconfirmed, unnamed sources. Networks put so-called “security experts” on air to speculate about “terror cells” and “self-radicalization.” In the end, there was no evidence of terrorism.

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Don't have an account? Create Account

As Official Opposition leader enjoying a 14-point advantage, and knowing he’s being evaluated as a potential prime minister, Poilievre should also know the weight and influence of his words. But things started to unravel during Wednesday’s question period when he specifically referred to terror. “Mr. Speaker,” he asked, “we’ve just heard media reports, a terrorist attack, an explosion at the Niagara crossing of the Canada-U.S. border… Can the prime minister give us an update on what he knows and what action plan he will immediately implement to bring security for our people?”

Here’s the problem: Terror, or the spectre of it, is by definition terrifying for all of us. Those who have been personally devastated by terror-related violence. Those who have loved ones victimized by terrorism elsewhere. Those who live in fear of it.

For innocent, law-abiding Muslims, South Asians and Arabs in Canada, reports of terror attacks in North America conjure a special kind of dread, reminding them of the way their communities were targeted domestically for the actions of terrorists abroad after 9/11. The racial profiling. The “extra document checks” at airports. The stress of being “othered.” Every time something like the Rainbow Bridge crash happens, a significant segment of Canadians say a silent prayer. “Please don’t let it be terrorism. Please don’t let it be Brown people.”

A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond.

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

There was nothing wrong with Poilievre asking for an update about a serious and fluid situation near an important border crossing. There was something very wrong with using the “T-word” without knowing for sure it was, indeed, that. The phrasing of the question was, at best, a careless but damaging mistake; at worst, calculated use of dog-whistle language to spark fear and finger-pointing.

Poilievre knew to attribute his use of “terror” to “media reports.” His verbal swipe at the Canadian Press and CTV in a scrum the next day, blaming journalists for their reporting, was his “out.” If they got the story “wrong,” how could it be his fault?

Regardless, his behaviour lacked both propriety and necessity. Especially when society’s nerves are already scraped raw. Especially when Poilievre had an opportunity to show leadership.

The actual terror attack by Hamas that killed more than 1,200 Israelis and took more than 200 hostages has left Canadian Jews in shock, grief and, yes, terrorized. The response by the Israeli Defence Force that killed more than 14,000 according to authorities in Gaza has left Canadian Palestinians in shock, grief and, yes, terrorized.

The last six weeks have brought out the worst in us. Bomb threats and shootings at Jewish schools. Calls for doxxing, censure and harassment of students and faculty who sympathize with Palestinians and ceasefire calls. In Toronto alone, police are reporting 17 incidents of Islamophobic or anti-Palestinian hate crimes since Oct. 7 (compared to just one in the same period in 2022). Antisemitic hate crimes numbered 38 (last year it was 13 in the same period) and now comprise half of all hate crimes reported to Toronto police since Oct. 7.

At such a fraught time, leadership from Poilievre would see his words about these highly sensitive issues focused on appealing to Canadians’ better natures, not further driving them into suspicion and division.

But will the opposition leader and his strategists do this? We are not so far removed from the failed Conservative campaign of 2015, notorious for its “barbaric cultural practices” tip line. The director of that disastrous campaign is reportedly tipped to direct the upcoming one.

Poilievre and the Conservatives for now, anyway, have the support of a plurality of Canadians. They need to start acting like it means something to them.

Shachi Kurl is President of the Angus Reid Institute, a national, not-for-profit, non-partisan public opinion research foundation.

Our website is your destination for up-to-the-minute news and smart commentary. Please bookmark ottawacitizen.com and sign up for our newsletters so we can keep you informed.

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

QOSHE - Kurl: As a potential prime minister, Pierre Poilievre needs to choose his words much more carefully - Shachi Kurl
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

Kurl: As a potential prime minister, Pierre Poilievre needs to choose his words much more carefully

11 0
24.11.2023

At such a fraught time, Poilievre should appeal to Canadians’ better natures, not further drive them into suspicion and division.

In politics, it is never too early or too late for a winning team to blow its lead. Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre appears to have decided that now is the time to risk squandering his political good fortune.

In the hours after an explosion killed two people at the Rainbow Bridge this week, some early reportage relied heavily on unconfirmed, unnamed sources. Networks put so-called “security experts” on air to speculate about “terror cells” and “self-radicalization.” In the end, there was no evidence of terrorism.

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Don't have an account? Create Account

As Official Opposition leader enjoying a 14-point advantage, and knowing he’s being evaluated as a potential prime minister, Poilievre should also know the weight and influence of his words. But things started to unravel during Wednesday’s question period when he specifically referred to terror. “Mr. Speaker,” he asked, “we’ve just heard media reports, a terrorist attack, an explosion at the Niagara crossing of the Canada-U.S. border… Can the prime minister give us an update on what he knows and what action plan he will immediately implement to........

© Vancouver Sun


Get it on Google Play